You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to soap-dev@ws.apache.org by Niket Anand <ni...@npi.stpn.soft.net> on 2002/07/08 15:47:01 UTC
difference between soap and Message Driven Bean
Hi All,
Can anybody tell me the difference of sending message as (Text, Object,etc) via Soap and Message Driven Bean?
Which is better in terms of security?
The actual scenario is as follows:-
There are two Application servers running remotely.
server A in India and server B in US.
In folder A/xmlfoder XML files, containing A's data, are placed.
similarly in folder B/xmlfolder XML files, containing B's data, are placed.
At certain time these xml files are needed to synchronized with each other i.e server B will get A's xml data and insert into its database and vice versa.
So, How should I send XML content from server A to server B and vice versa?
Can anybody suggest me which technology SOAP or message driven bean should I use as through both I can send object?
pls reply....
Thanks,
Niket
Re: difference between soap and Message Driven Bean
Posted by Niket Anand <ni...@npi.stpn.soft.net>.
Thanks Scott for ur nice suggestion.
Actually let me tell you more about my scenario.
I have to check KeepAlive process before synchronization of data between
servers A and B.
At certain time Server A will check keepalive with Server B.
If it is successful then I have to send all xml files at A to server B. For
these process How can I use SSL for authentication and How should I send
these XML files to other server? and the same process of sending xml files
from B to A.
Do you have any examples or sample code?
If in any side(A or B), xml files are invalidated then I have to return
synchronization status as failed.
It would be great help.
Thanks,
Niket
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Nichol" <sn...@scottnichol.com>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>; <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: difference between soap and Message Driven Bean
> Niket,
>
> If you already have a messaging that supports the JMS API running between
> the sites and are satisified with its security, I would think you would
want
> to use message driven beans. If not, then I think you would have an
easier
> time installing and administering SOAP. For security, you would use SSL,
> which provides encryption, server authenticatication and (optionally)
client
> authentication.
>
> With either technology, in your implementation each server would basically
> have a daemon or periodically run process that would make the call to send
> the data to the other server.
>
> Scott Nichol
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Niket Anand" <ni...@npi.stpn.soft.net>
> To: <so...@xml.apache.org>; <so...@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:47 AM
> Subject: difference between soap and Message Driven Bean
>
>
> Hi All,
> Can anybody tell me the difference of sending message as (Text,
Object,etc)
> via Soap and Message Driven Bean?
> Which is better in terms of security?
> The actual scenario is as follows:-
> There are two Application servers running remotely.
> server A in India and server B in US.
> In folder A/xmlfoder XML files, containing A's data, are placed.
> similarly in folder B/xmlfolder XML files, containing B's data, are
placed.
> At certain time these xml files are needed to synchronized with each other
> i.e server B will get A's xml data and insert into its database and vice
> versa.
> So, How should I send XML content from server A to server B and vice
versa?
> Can anybody suggest me which technology SOAP or message driven bean should
I
> use as through both I can send object?
> pls reply....
> Thanks,
> Niket
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
Re: difference between soap and Message Driven Bean
Posted by Niket Anand <ni...@npi.stpn.soft.net>.
Thanks Scott for ur nice suggestion.
Actually let me tell you more about my scenario.
I have to check KeepAlive process before synchronization of data between
servers A and B.
At certain time Server A will check keepalive with Server B.
If it is successful then I have to send all xml files at A to server B. For
these process How can I use SSL for authentication and How should I send
these XML files to other server? and the same process of sending xml files
from B to A.
Do you have any examples or sample code?
If in any side(A or B), xml files are invalidated then I have to return
synchronization status as failed.
It would be great help.
Thanks,
Niket
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Nichol" <sn...@scottnichol.com>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>; <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: difference between soap and Message Driven Bean
> Niket,
>
> If you already have a messaging that supports the JMS API running between
> the sites and are satisified with its security, I would think you would
want
> to use message driven beans. If not, then I think you would have an
easier
> time installing and administering SOAP. For security, you would use SSL,
> which provides encryption, server authenticatication and (optionally)
client
> authentication.
>
> With either technology, in your implementation each server would basically
> have a daemon or periodically run process that would make the call to send
> the data to the other server.
>
> Scott Nichol
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Niket Anand" <ni...@npi.stpn.soft.net>
> To: <so...@xml.apache.org>; <so...@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:47 AM
> Subject: difference between soap and Message Driven Bean
>
>
> Hi All,
> Can anybody tell me the difference of sending message as (Text,
Object,etc)
> via Soap and Message Driven Bean?
> Which is better in terms of security?
> The actual scenario is as follows:-
> There are two Application servers running remotely.
> server A in India and server B in US.
> In folder A/xmlfoder XML files, containing A's data, are placed.
> similarly in folder B/xmlfolder XML files, containing B's data, are
placed.
> At certain time these xml files are needed to synchronized with each other
> i.e server B will get A's xml data and insert into its database and vice
> versa.
> So, How should I send XML content from server A to server B and vice
versa?
> Can anybody suggest me which technology SOAP or message driven bean should
I
> use as through both I can send object?
> pls reply....
> Thanks,
> Niket
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
Re: difference between soap and Message Driven Bean
Posted by Scott Nichol <sn...@scottnichol.com>.
Niket,
If you already have a messaging that supports the JMS API running between
the sites and are satisified with its security, I would think you would want
to use message driven beans. If not, then I think you would have an easier
time installing and administering SOAP. For security, you would use SSL,
which provides encryption, server authenticatication and (optionally) client
authentication.
With either technology, in your implementation each server would basically
have a daemon or periodically run process that would make the call to send
the data to the other server.
Scott Nichol
----- Original Message -----
From: "Niket Anand" <ni...@npi.stpn.soft.net>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>; <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:47 AM
Subject: difference between soap and Message Driven Bean
Hi All,
Can anybody tell me the difference of sending message as (Text, Object,etc)
via Soap and Message Driven Bean?
Which is better in terms of security?
The actual scenario is as follows:-
There are two Application servers running remotely.
server A in India and server B in US.
In folder A/xmlfoder XML files, containing A's data, are placed.
similarly in folder B/xmlfolder XML files, containing B's data, are placed.
At certain time these xml files are needed to synchronized with each other
i.e server B will get A's xml data and insert into its database and vice
versa.
So, How should I send XML content from server A to server B and vice versa?
Can anybody suggest me which technology SOAP or message driven bean should I
use as through both I can send object?
pls reply....
Thanks,
Niket
Re: difference between soap and Message Driven Bean
Posted by Scott Nichol <sn...@scottnichol.com>.
Niket,
If you already have a messaging that supports the JMS API running between
the sites and are satisified with its security, I would think you would want
to use message driven beans. If not, then I think you would have an easier
time installing and administering SOAP. For security, you would use SSL,
which provides encryption, server authenticatication and (optionally) client
authentication.
With either technology, in your implementation each server would basically
have a daemon or periodically run process that would make the call to send
the data to the other server.
Scott Nichol
----- Original Message -----
From: "Niket Anand" <ni...@npi.stpn.soft.net>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>; <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:47 AM
Subject: difference between soap and Message Driven Bean
Hi All,
Can anybody tell me the difference of sending message as (Text, Object,etc)
via Soap and Message Driven Bean?
Which is better in terms of security?
The actual scenario is as follows:-
There are two Application servers running remotely.
server A in India and server B in US.
In folder A/xmlfoder XML files, containing A's data, are placed.
similarly in folder B/xmlfolder XML files, containing B's data, are placed.
At certain time these xml files are needed to synchronized with each other
i.e server B will get A's xml data and insert into its database and vice
versa.
So, How should I send XML content from server A to server B and vice versa?
Can anybody suggest me which technology SOAP or message driven bean should I
use as through both I can send object?
pls reply....
Thanks,
Niket
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>