You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jaxme-dev@ws.apache.org by Ias <ia...@tmax.co.kr> on 2004/01/02 16:41:27 UTC

[FYI]FW: Y2004 copyright update

What do you think of this issue?

Happy New Year!

Ias

=========================================================
Lee, Changshin (Korean name)
Ias (International name)
               Company Web Site: http://www.tmax.co.kr
               Personal Web Site: http://www.iasandcb.pe.kr
---------------------------------------------------------
JSR 201, JSR 204 and JSR 222 EG member
Apache Axis (JAX-RPC and SAAJ) and JaxMe (JAXB) committer
R&D Institute
Tmax Soft, Inc.
=========================================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:remm@apache.org] 
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 10:49 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Y2004 copyright update

Happy new year everyone :)

I found this useful info on the commons-dev mailing list:

"Committers should update the copyright notice on the Apache License to
include the current year when they revise a source file. If it is 2002, and
you revise a source file from 1999, change the copyright notice in the
license to cite "1999, 2002". If the file was from 2001, we would change it
to 2001-2002. And so forth. This will happen most often in the early part of
a year, but maintenance of the copyright date should occur year-round, as
needed."

I'm sure I'm going to forget about it, though ;-)

Rémy



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jaxme-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jaxme-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Re: [FYI]FW: Y2004 copyright update

Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@ispsoft.de>.
Ias wrote:

> What do you think of this issue?

That I agree with the following:

 > I'm sure I'm going to forget about it, though ;-)

IMO this part is not so important. In the past days, when a copyright
required explicit request (at least in the US) this may have been
important. The copyright is nowadays implicit, so I would not see a
need for any action.


Jochen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jaxme-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jaxme-dev-help@ws.apache.org