You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Lee Dongjin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/06/12 13:59:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-14376) spark.ml parity for trees

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16509658#comment-16509658 ] 

Lee Dongjin commented on SPARK-14376:
-------------------------------------

[~josephkb] Excuse me. Is there any reason this issue is still opned? It seems like all sub-issues and linked issues are resolved.

> spark.ml parity for trees
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-14376
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14376
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: ML
>            Reporter: Joseph K. Bradley
>            Assignee: Joseph K. Bradley
>            Priority: Major
>
> Review parity of spark.ml vs. spark.mllib to ensure spark.ml contains all functionality.  List all missing items.
> This only covers Scala since we can compare Scala vs. Python in spark.ml itself.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org