You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@beam.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/06/03 16:09:11 UTC

[GitHub] [beam] kennknowles opened a new issue, #18015: QuantileStateCoder should be a StandardCoder

kennknowles opened a new issue, #18015:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/18015

   The issue is that the coder does not report component encodings which prevents effective runner inspection of the components.
   
   Imported from Jira [BEAM-466](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-466). Original Jira may contain additional context.
   Reported by: lcwik.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@beam.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [beam] algorithmor commented on issue #18015: QuantileStateCoder should be a StandardCoder

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
algorithmor commented on issue #18015:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/18015#issuecomment-1186554082

   Newbie here trying to help. I was going through the codebase and found following info.
   
   2d13bacf9880801fb8398bc5f214e6518e62cce8 renamed StandardCoder to StructuredCoder
   cbcec7c0520f151f348604621cc251b6ed9b1616 converted most of the standard coders to CustomCoders
   
   So, is the goal in this issue now that QuantileStateCoder should be a StructuredCoder or should it be a CustomCoder?
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@beam.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [beam] kennknowles commented on issue #18015: QuantileStateCoder should be a StandardCoder

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
kennknowles commented on issue #18015:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/18015#issuecomment-1194940787

   Ah yes. The goal is to make everything a `StructuredCoder` so it can have a representation that a runner understands.
   
   Noting that this tag of "backwards incompatible" means the change might be tricky.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@beam.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org