You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by Ronan Lucio <ro...@tiper.com.br> on 2006/11/21 17:44:34 UTC

Apache or SVNServe?

Hi,

Why I always see tutorial talking about subversion + Apache
and almost nothing about subversion + svnserver?

I should be wrong, but Apache integration doesn´t seem to be
the more secure option.

What do you think about svnserver?

Thank you,
Ronan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Apache or SVNServe?

Posted by Ryan Schmidt <su...@ryandesign.com>.
On Nov 21, 2006, at 11:44, Ronan Lucio wrote:

> Why I always see tutorial talking about subversion + Apache
> and almost nothing about subversion + svnserver?
>
> I should be wrong, but Apache integration doesn´t seem to be
> the more secure option.
>
> What do you think about svnserver?

Both Apache and svnserve are fine servers. Neither is inherently  
"better" than the other; both are good for different purposes.  
svnserve can do less, but can be faster. Apache offers more options,  
in particular relating to authentication.

Both Apache and svnserve can be set up insecurely, or securely.  
Apache can use the http protocol, which is insecure, or the https  
protocol, which is secure. svnserve can use the svn protocol, which  
is insecure, or tunnel over ssh using the svn+ssh protocol, which is  
secure. You as system administrator need to decide whether you should  
use a secure or insecure protocol. Insecure protocols are a bit  
faster, which can be a consideration if hardware resources are  
limited, but if your repository is accessible outside of a corporate  
intranet (that is, available on the Internet) and the contents should  
not be publicly accessible (as in, you offer password-protected  
access), then you should use a secure protocol.

Instructions for setting up both are in the book:

http://svnbook.org/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org


Re: Apache or SVNServe?

Posted by Ron Olson <ta...@gmail.com>.
I use both; if I need to access the repository over the internet where I'm
behind a proxy, I use Apache. Locally, where Apache is configured for other
things on the box we use, I use svnserve.

svnserve is definitely easier, IMHO, to set up, but how you access the
repository should really govern which one you use.

On 11/21/06, Ronan Lucio <ro...@tiper.com.br> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Why I always see tutorial talking about subversion + Apache
> and almost nothing about subversion + svnserver?
>
> I should be wrong, but Apache integration doesn´t seem to be
> the more secure option.
>
> What do you think about svnserver?
>
> Thank you,
> Ronan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>

Re: Apache or SVNServe?

Posted by Dmitri Colebatch <di...@colebatch.com>.
Hi Ronon,

I've just recently migrated our source code repository from CVS to SVN and
initially setup svnserve (which is still set up) but because our central
password store is LDAP I have now changed this to apache as this is the only
way to hook into LDAP for authentication.

cheers
dim


On 11/22/06, Ronan Lucio <ro...@tiper.com.br> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Why I always see tutorial talking about subversion + Apache
> and almost nothing about subversion + svnserver?
>
> I should be wrong, but Apache integration doesn´t seem to be
> the more secure option.
>
> What do you think about svnserver?
>
> Thank you,
> Ronan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>

Re: Apache or SVNServe?

Posted by Riccardo Maria Bianchi <ri...@physik.uni-freiburg.de>.
Yes, I use svnserve over ssh too. It's fine.

   Ric.


Chris.Fouts@qimonda.com wrote:
> I use Subversion via svnserve over SSH... 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

RE: Apache or SVNServe?

Posted by Ch...@qimonda.com.
I use Subversion via svnserve over SSH... 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ronan Lucio [mailto:ronan@tiper.com.br] 
>Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 12:45 PM
>To: users@subversion.tigris.org
>Subject: Apache or SVNServe?
>
>Hi,
>
>Why I always see tutorial talking about subversion + Apache 
>and almost nothing about subversion + svnserver?
>
>I should be wrong, but Apache integration doesn´t seem to be 
>the more secure option.
>
>What do you think about svnserver?
>
>Thank you,
>Ronan
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org