Re: Is SqlQuery efficient than SqlFieldsQuery?

[vkulichenko <va...@gmail.com>]

Hi Patrick,

Please properly subscribe to the mailing list so that the community can
receive email notifications for your messages. To subscribe, send empty
email to user-subscribe@ignite.apache.org and follow simple instructions in
the reply.


wbyeh wrote
> I have used a SqlQuery to instead of a SqlFieldsQuery and it has less
> vibration of execution time measuring from the log.  Originally, I was
> using the SqlFieldsQuery to search the Top key values that matched my
> criteria (also using GroupIndex) and I found it was very quirky from many
> over milli-seconds to hundred micro-seconds for dynamic searches. After I
> replaced it in SqlQuery instead, it is running mostly within 2
> milli-seconds to hundred micro-seconds. 
> 
> Therefore, I want to know "Is SqlQuery efficient than SqlFieldsQuery?"
> 
> String sql = "select bid from AskRecord where (amount <=? and (LIMITWIN
> >=? and LIMITPLACE >=?))"
> 		+ " and (LIVE =? and WIN > 0 and PLACE > 0) LIMIT ?";
> 
> 
> String oql = "(amount <=? and (LIMITWIN >=? and LIMITPLACE >=?))"
> 		+ " and (LIVE =? and WIN > 0 and PLACE > 0) LIMIT ?";
> 
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> -Patrick

Generally there should not be much difference in performance. Do you have a
test that you can share with us?

-Val



--
View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Is-SqlQuery-efficient-than-SqlFieldsQuery-tp7544p7559.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.