Re: proportional-column-width+20mm -- should this have ever worked?

[Lo...@log-net.com]

Thanks.  I needed to know that I wasn't completely off the mark on this 
one.
-Lou



Andreas Delmelle <an...@telenet.be> wrote on 02/29/2008 
03:13:39 PM:

> On Feb 29, 2008, at 16:58, Louis.Masters@log-net.com wrote:
> 
> Hi Lou
> 
> It should definitely work. That is: it is a perfectly legitimate 
> value for column-width.
> So it's certainly nothing you're doing wrong (if you needed 
> confirmation)
> 
> > A small correction...
> >
> > The following work OK:
> >
> > <fo:table-column column-width="20mm+proportional-column-width(1)"/>
> >
> > The following results in the table running off page:
> >
> > <fo:table-column column-width="proportional-column-width(1)+20mm"/>
> 
> Had a quick look at the code, and at the side of the FO properties, 
> everything seems to be still OK.
> 
> Both cases yield a column-width that is a RelativeNumericProperty 
> consisting of two operands:
> * a FixedLength of 56692mpt
> * a TableColLength of 1 table-unit
> 
> It seems that, when the FixedLength is specified first, the 
> computation of table-units is based on the table-width minus the 
> FixedLength, but when the FixedLength is the second operand, the 
> FixedLengths are not subtracted of the table-width...
> 
> I'll have a closer look, and see what I can find out. In the 
> meantime, you have already found the workaround.
> 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Andreas
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>