Re: CVS -> SVN Migration Status

[Mark Womack <mw...@apache.org>]

Henri, et al,

I believe we are good to go for the migration, with the following changes:

logging-sandbox : Move the existing cvs dirs into a "log4j" subdir.

logging-site : We need the branches and tags moved over from the cvs repo. 
Also, please double check the settings on this repo as I could only checkout 
using http, not https.  No one else seemed to have this issue, just me.

You had also previously mentioned something about a "core" repo yet to be 
converted.  I don't know what that one is.

Let us know what the next steps will be.  With the above, we are ready to go 
(finally).

much appreciated,
-Mark

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Womack" <mw...@apache.org>
To: "Logging General" <ge...@logging.apache.org>; <ba...@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 8:31 PM
Subject: CVS -> SVN Migration Status


> chainsaw - Build process verified (Scott)
>
> log4jcxx - Repository reviewed, still need to verify the build process 
> (Curt todo).
>
> log4j - Build process for the head and the 1_2branch verified for the 
> classes/jars.  Still need to verify the dist builds which are dependent on 
> the logging-site repository (see below). (Mark)
>
> log4net - Build process verified (Nicko)
>
> sandbox - Build process verified.  But when we move it for real we want to 
> move the current code into a sandbox/log4j subdir if we can.  If not, then 
> we'll just do it manually after the migration.  The sandbox will be shared 
> by all of the subprojects. (Mark)
>
> site - I still cannot check out the site.  Is anyone else encountering 
> this, or is it just me?  My cygwin svn command line client works fine with 
> all of the other repositories except for logging-site.  I'll try a 
> different client tomorrow evening.
>
> Thanks everyone.  With hurricane Rita bearing down on Curt's location we 
> may be delayed in completing the entire migration.  But we are almost 
> there and things are looking good (except for Rita, of course).
>
> -Mark
>
> 

Re: CVS -> SVN Migration Status

[Mark Womack <mw...@apache.org>]

Thanks, Henri.  I will take a look at the new versions tomorrow.

All, please take a look at your respective subproject related repos.  If 
there are any issues, now is the time to bring it up.  Otherwise we will do 
the conversion as Henri mentions.

thanks,
-Mark

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Henri Yandell" <ba...@apache.org>
To: "Mark Womack" <mw...@apache.org>
Cc: "Logging General" <ge...@logging.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: CVS -> SVN Migration Status


>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/logging/
>
> I repeated the migration, log4j-sandbox now found in 
> logging/sandbox/log4j, and the site now keeps its branches/tags.
>
> See how it looks, unless I hear otherwise I'll go ahead and do the real 
> migration at 8pm on Saturday US/Eastern.
>
> Hen
>
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Mark Womack wrote:
>
>> Henri, et al,
>>
>> I believe we are good to go for the migration, with the following 
>> changes:
>>
>> logging-sandbox : Move the existing cvs dirs into a "log4j" subdir.
>>
>> logging-site : We need the branches and tags moved over from the cvs 
>> repo. Also, please double check the settings on this repo as I could only 
>> checkout using http, not https.  No one else seemed to have this issue, 
>> just me.
>>
>> You had also previously mentioned something about a "core" repo yet to be 
>> converted.  I don't know what that one is.
>>
>> Let us know what the next steps will be.  With the above, we are ready to 
>> go (finally).
>>
>> much appreciated,
>> -Mark
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Womack" <mw...@apache.org>
>> To: "Logging General" <ge...@logging.apache.org>; <ba...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 8:31 PM
>> Subject: CVS -> SVN Migration Status
>>
>>
>>> chainsaw - Build process verified (Scott)
>>>
>>> log4jcxx - Repository reviewed, still need to verify the build process 
>>> (Curt todo).
>>>
>>> log4j - Build process for the head and the 1_2branch verified for the 
>>> classes/jars.  Still need to verify the dist builds which are dependent 
>>> on the logging-site repository (see below). (Mark)
>>>
>>> log4net - Build process verified (Nicko)
>>>
>>> sandbox - Build process verified.  But when we move it for real we want 
>>> to move the current code into a sandbox/log4j subdir if we can.  If not, 
>>> then we'll just do it manually after the migration.  The sandbox will be 
>>> shared by all of the subprojects. (Mark)
>>>
>>> site - I still cannot check out the site.  Is anyone else encountering 
>>> this, or is it just me?  My cygwin svn command line client works fine 
>>> with all of the other repositories except for logging-site.  I'll try a 
>>> different client tomorrow evening.
>>>
>>> Thanks everyone.  With hurricane Rita bearing down on Curt's location we 
>>> may be delayed in completing the entire migration.  But we are almost 
>>> there and things are looking good (except for Rita, of course).
>>>
>>> -Mark
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 

Re: CVS -> SVN Migration Status

[Mark Womack <mw...@apache.org>]

Ceki (or anyone), can you shed any light on the logging "core" cvs module? 
Have we used it for anything?

-Mark

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <ba...@apache.org>
To: "Mark Womack" <mw...@apache.org>
Cc: "Logging General" <ge...@logging.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: CVS -> SVN Migration Status


>
> I'll do some work tomorrow on a repeat migration to test to cover the 
> sandbox and site issues, then leaving that there for you to check, I'll 
> aim to do the real migration on Saturday at 8pm US/Eastern.
>
> -
>
> I'll deal with the various tlp-core modules that are out there at a later 
> stage. I think they're private pmc modules, but the fact that you don't 
> use yours (by the sound of it) implies they might not be very essential.
>
> I've asked the various root@ people if I could have temporary group 
> membership to various tlp's so I can see inside the directories in order 
> to get the migration done.
>
> Hen