You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> on 2014/02/20 03:53:19 UTC
[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.12.3
On 02/15/2014 11:16 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.12.3, a patch release coming
> with about 128 issues fixed.
>
> Release notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12325593
>
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1002
>
> Tarballs:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1002/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.12.3/
>
>
> Tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=camel.git;a=tag;h=4bf31d2e2cbc34fda60d68c0dd33cb39d63ba1c6
>
>
> Please test this release candidate and cast your vote.
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.12.3
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Hadrian
AW: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.12.3
Posted by "Jan Matèrne (jhm)" <ap...@materne.de>.
AFAIK that vulnerability is inside the built javadoc-html.
Is that generated javadoc part of the release?
I checked http://apache.openmirror.de/camel/apache-camel/2.12.2/apache-camel-2.12.2.zip and didnt found any javadoc.
So that wouldnt force the use of Java7.
Jan
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Willem Jiang [mailto:willem.jiang@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2014 08:43
> An: dev@camel.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.12.3
>
> "Supports JDK 6" could mean from the source and binary level, but we
> still need to choice one version of JDK to build the kit. There is a
> known javadoc issue[1] which we cannot get fix from public released
> JDK6, so I prefer to build the kit with JDK7 and make sure the classes
> are target to 1.6.
>
> I can cut a new version Camel 2.12.3 this week but we need to postpone
> the release of Camel 2.13.0 , as I don’t have enough time to do two
> release this month.
>
> --
> Willem Jiang
>
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Web: http://www.redhat.com
> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com(http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/)
> (English)
> http://jnn.iteye.com(http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
>
>
> On February 20, 2014 at 11:03:42 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea
> (hzbarcea@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > While we had enough votes to pass this release I chose not to. I
> don't
> > have cycles to cut another release in the next week week or so.
> > This
> > release is also blocking the AMQ release.
> >
> > I would not release with 1.7 anyway, so maybe it would be a good idea
> > to look into fixing the html doc stuff with 1.6 if it's that
> important
> > to you guys. There are many users who rebuild Camel from sources and
> > what you are saying is that while we support 1.6, we actually don't.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Hadrian
> >
> >
> >
> > On 02/19/2014 09:53 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> > > On 02/15/2014 11:16 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> > >> This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.12.3, a patch release
> > coming
> > >> with about 128 issues fixed.
> > >>
> > >> Release notes:
> > >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12
> > >> 311211&version=12325593
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Staging repo:
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-
> 1
> > >> 002
> > >>
> > >> Tarballs:
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-
> 1
> > >> 002/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.12.3/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Tag:
> > >> https://git-wip-
> us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=camel.git;a=tag;h=4bf31d2
> > >> e2cbc34fda60d68c0dd33cb39d63ba1c6
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Please test this release candidate and cast your vote.
> > >> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.12.3 [ ] -1 Veto the
> > >> release (provide specific comments) Vote is open for at least 72
> > >> hours.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Hadrian
> > >
> >
> >
Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.12.3
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
My point is this: if we say that Camel supports 1.6 then it should be
built with 1.6 with the expected results, including the html doc if we
claim that to be part of the release. Otherwise we support 1.6 only for
runtime, which is not what we say actually. I think this has to be
clarified before the next 2.12.x release. Without this fixed, I will -1
the next 2.12.x release, because part of testing the release I will
build from sources.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 02/20/2014 02:43 AM, Willem Jiang wrote:
> "Supports JDK 6" could mean from the source and binary level, but we still need to choice one version of JDK to build the kit. There is a known javadoc issue[1] which we cannot get fix from public released JDK6, so I prefer to build the kit with JDK7 and make sure the classes are target to 1.6.
>
> I can cut a new version Camel 2.12.3 this week but we need to postpone the release of Camel 2.13.0 , as I don’t have enough time to do two release this month.
>
> --
> Willem Jiang
>
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Web: http://www.redhat.com
> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com(http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English)
> http://jnn.iteye.com(http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
>
>
> On February 20, 2014 at 11:03:42 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea (hzbarcea@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>> While we had enough votes to pass this release I chose not to. I
>> don't
>> have cycles to cut another release in the next week week or so.
>> This
>> release is also blocking the AMQ release.
>>
>> I would not release with 1.7 anyway, so maybe it would be a good
>> idea to
>> look into fixing the html doc stuff with 1.6 if it's that important
>> to
>> you guys. There are many users who rebuild Camel from sources
>> and what
>> you are saying is that while we support 1.6, we actually don't.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Hadrian
>>
>>
>>
>> On 02/19/2014 09:53 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>> On 02/15/2014 11:16 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>> This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.12.3, a patch release
>> coming
>>>> with about 128 issues fixed.
>>>>
>>>> Release notes:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12325593
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Staging repo:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1002
>>>>
>>>> Tarballs:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1002/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.12.3/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tag:
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=camel.git;a=tag;h=4bf31d2e2cbc34fda60d68c0dd33cb39d63ba1c6
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please test this release candidate and cast your vote.
>>>> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.12.3
>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>>>> Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Hadrian
>>
>>
Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.12.3
Posted by Willem Jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.
Here is the link of javadoc issue[1] which I forgot to add in my last mail.
[1]http://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/oracle-update-includes-javadoc-frame-injection-vulnerability/
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com(http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com(http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On February 20, 2014 at 3:43:43 PM, Willem Jiang (willem.jiang@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> "Supports JDK 6" could mean from the source and binary level,
> but we still need to choice one version of JDK to build the kit.
> There is a known javadoc issue[1] which we cannot get fix from
> public released JDK6, so I prefer to build the kit with JDK7 and
> make sure the classes are target to 1.6.
>
> I can cut a new version Camel 2.12.3 this week but we need to postpone
> the release of Camel 2.13.0 , as I don’t have enough time to do two
> release this month.
>
> --
> Willem Jiang
>
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Web: http://www.redhat.com
> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com(http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/)
> (English)
> http://jnn.iteye.com(http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
>
>
> On February 20, 2014 at 11:03:42 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea (hzbarcea@gmail.com)
> wrote:
> >
> > While we had enough votes to pass this release I chose not to.
> I
> > don't
> > have cycles to cut another release in the next week week or so.
> > This
> > release is also blocking the AMQ release.
> >
> > I would not release with 1.7 anyway, so maybe it would be a good
> > idea to
> > look into fixing the html doc stuff with 1.6 if it's that important
> > to
> > you guys. There are many users who rebuild Camel from sources
> > and what
> > you are saying is that while we support 1.6, we actually don't.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Hadrian
> >
> >
> >
> > On 02/19/2014 09:53 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> > > On 02/15/2014 11:16 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> > >> This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.12.3, a patch release
> > coming
> > >> with about 128 issues fixed.
> > >>
> > >> Release notes:
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12325593
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Staging repo:
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1002
> > >>
> > >> Tarballs:
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1002/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.12.3/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Tag:
> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=camel.git;a=tag;h=4bf31d2e2cbc34fda60d68c0dd33cb39d63ba1c6
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Please test this release candidate and cast your vote.
> > >> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.12.3
> > >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> > >> Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Hadrian
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.12.3
Posted by Willem Jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.
"Supports JDK 6" could mean from the source and binary level, but we still need to choice one version of JDK to build the kit. There is a known javadoc issue[1] which we cannot get fix from public released JDK6, so I prefer to build the kit with JDK7 and make sure the classes are target to 1.6.
I can cut a new version Camel 2.12.3 this week but we need to postpone the release of Camel 2.13.0 , as I don’t have enough time to do two release this month.
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com(http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com(http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On February 20, 2014 at 11:03:42 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea (hzbarcea@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> While we had enough votes to pass this release I chose not to. I
> don't
> have cycles to cut another release in the next week week or so.
> This
> release is also blocking the AMQ release.
>
> I would not release with 1.7 anyway, so maybe it would be a good
> idea to
> look into fixing the html doc stuff with 1.6 if it's that important
> to
> you guys. There are many users who rebuild Camel from sources
> and what
> you are saying is that while we support 1.6, we actually don't.
>
> Cheers,
> Hadrian
>
>
>
> On 02/19/2014 09:53 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> > On 02/15/2014 11:16 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> >> This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.12.3, a patch release
> coming
> >> with about 128 issues fixed.
> >>
> >> Release notes:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12325593
> >>
> >>
> >> Staging repo:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1002
> >>
> >> Tarballs:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1002/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.12.3/
> >>
> >>
> >> Tag:
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=camel.git;a=tag;h=4bf31d2e2cbc34fda60d68c0dd33cb39d63ba1c6
> >>
> >>
> >> Please test this release candidate and cast your vote.
> >> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.12.3
> >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> >> Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Hadrian
> >
>
>
AW: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.12.3
Posted by "Jan Matèrne (jhm)" <ap...@materne.de>.
> I would not release with 1.7 anyway, so maybe it would be a good idea
> to look into fixing the html doc stuff with 1.6 if it's that important
> to you guys. There are many users who rebuild Camel from sources and
> what you are saying is that while we support 1.6, we actually don't.
>
> Cheers,
> Hadrian
I found a list which Java versions are supported:
http://camel.apache.org/can-i-use-camel-on-java-14.html
- Camel <2 .7.0: Java5
- Camel 2. 7.0: Java6
- Camel 2.10.0: Java6 required, Java7 supported
Jan
Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.12.3
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
While we had enough votes to pass this release I chose not to. I don't
have cycles to cut another release in the next week week or so. This
release is also blocking the AMQ release.
I would not release with 1.7 anyway, so maybe it would be a good idea to
look into fixing the html doc stuff with 1.6 if it's that important to
you guys. There are many users who rebuild Camel from sources and what
you are saying is that while we support 1.6, we actually don't.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 02/19/2014 09:53 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> On 02/15/2014 11:16 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>> This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.12.3, a patch release coming
>> with about 128 issues fixed.
>>
>> Release notes:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12325593
>>
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1002
>>
>> Tarballs:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1002/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.12.3/
>>
>>
>> Tag:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=camel.git;a=tag;h=4bf31d2e2cbc34fda60d68c0dd33cb39d63ba1c6
>>
>>
>> Please test this release candidate and cast your vote.
>> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.12.3
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>> Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hadrian
>