You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com> on 2016/01/01 15:41:18 UTC
Re: Add support in FacetsComponent for facet.method=uif
Is there any interest in this? While i think it's important and inline
with faceting available in the new json facet api, I've seen no discussion
on it so I'm wondering if it's best I add support for this using a custom
facet component even though the majority of the component will be a copy
which is prefer to not need to maintain separately.
Jamie
On Dec 22, 2015 12:37 PM, "Jamie Johnson" <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I had previously piggybacked on another post, but I think it may have been
> lost there. I had a need to do UnInvertedField based faceting in the
> FacetsComponent and as such started looking at what would be required to
> implement something similar to what the JSON Facets based API does in this
> regard. The patch that I have in this regard works and is attached to
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096, is that appropriate or
> should I create a new ticket to specifically add this support?
>
> -Jamie
>
Re: Add support in FacetsComponent for facet.method=uif
Posted by Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com>.
Are you looking at 8466 or 8096? The patch on 8466 is the one I'm
referencing. I should remove the other as it is more change than I think
should be done for this ticket.
Jamie
On Jan 3, 2016 8:47 PM, "William Bell" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok the path appears to have dv and uif in there.?
>
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The patch adds facet.method=uif and then delegates all of the work to the
> > JSON Faceting API to do the work. I had originally added a
> facet.method=dv
> > and made the original facet.method=fc work using the UnInvertedField but
> > wanted to avoid making a change that would introduce unexpected behavior.
> > While I think it's strange that facet.method=dv does not exist and fc
> > defaults to dv I think if we wanted to change that it should be done in
> > another ticket.
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:18 PM, William Bell <bi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Interesting that facet.method=dv or facet.method=uif. What is the
> > > difference?
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > For those interested I created a separate jira issue for this but
> > forgot
> > > to
> > > > attach earlier.
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8466
> > > > On Jan 2, 2016 8:45 PM, "William Bell" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes we would like backward compatibility. We cannot switch all the
> > > facet
> > > > > fields to DocValues and our faceting is slow.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please...
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Is there any interest in this? While i think it's important and
> > > inline
> > > > > > with faceting available in the new json facet api, I've seen no
> > > > > discussion
> > > > > > on it so I'm wondering if it's best I add support for this using
> a
> > > > custom
> > > > > > facet component even though the majority of the component will
> be a
> > > > copy
> > > > > > which is prefer to not need to maintain separately.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jamie
> > > > > > On Dec 22, 2015 12:37 PM, "Jamie Johnson" <je...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I had previously piggybacked on another post, but I think it
> may
> > > have
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > lost there. I had a need to do UnInvertedField based faceting
> in
> > > the
> > > > > > > FacetsComponent and as such started looking at what would be
> > > required
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > implement something similar to what the JSON Facets based API
> > does
> > > in
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > regard. The patch that I have in this regard works and is
> > attached
> > > > to
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096, is that
> > > appropriate
> > > > > or
> > > > > > > should I create a new ticket to specifically add this support?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Jamie
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Bill Bell
> > > > > billnbell@gmail.com
> > > > > cell 720-256-8076
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bill Bell
> > > billnbell@gmail.com
> > > cell 720-256-8076
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Bill Bell
> billnbell@gmail.com
> cell 720-256-8076
>
Re: Add support in FacetsComponent for facet.method=uif
Posted by William Bell <bi...@gmail.com>.
Ok the path appears to have dv and uif in there.?
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The patch adds facet.method=uif and then delegates all of the work to the
> JSON Faceting API to do the work. I had originally added a facet.method=dv
> and made the original facet.method=fc work using the UnInvertedField but
> wanted to avoid making a change that would introduce unexpected behavior.
> While I think it's strange that facet.method=dv does not exist and fc
> defaults to dv I think if we wanted to change that it should be done in
> another ticket.
>
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:18 PM, William Bell <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Interesting that facet.method=dv or facet.method=uif. What is the
> > difference?
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > For those interested I created a separate jira issue for this but
> forgot
> > to
> > > attach earlier.
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8466
> > > On Jan 2, 2016 8:45 PM, "William Bell" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes we would like backward compatibility. We cannot switch all the
> > facet
> > > > fields to DocValues and our faceting is slow.
> > > >
> > > > Please...
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Is there any interest in this? While i think it's important and
> > inline
> > > > > with faceting available in the new json facet api, I've seen no
> > > > discussion
> > > > > on it so I'm wondering if it's best I add support for this using a
> > > custom
> > > > > facet component even though the majority of the component will be a
> > > copy
> > > > > which is prefer to not need to maintain separately.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jamie
> > > > > On Dec 22, 2015 12:37 PM, "Jamie Johnson" <je...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I had previously piggybacked on another post, but I think it may
> > have
> > > > > been
> > > > > > lost there. I had a need to do UnInvertedField based faceting in
> > the
> > > > > > FacetsComponent and as such started looking at what would be
> > required
> > > > to
> > > > > > implement something similar to what the JSON Facets based API
> does
> > in
> > > > > this
> > > > > > regard. The patch that I have in this regard works and is
> attached
> > > to
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096, is that
> > appropriate
> > > > or
> > > > > > should I create a new ticket to specifically add this support?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Jamie
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Bill Bell
> > > > billnbell@gmail.com
> > > > cell 720-256-8076
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bill Bell
> > billnbell@gmail.com
> > cell 720-256-8076
> >
>
--
Bill Bell
billnbell@gmail.com
cell 720-256-8076
Re: Add support in FacetsComponent for facet.method=uif
Posted by Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com>.
The patch adds facet.method=uif and then delegates all of the work to the
JSON Faceting API to do the work. I had originally added a facet.method=dv
and made the original facet.method=fc work using the UnInvertedField but
wanted to avoid making a change that would introduce unexpected behavior.
While I think it's strange that facet.method=dv does not exist and fc
defaults to dv I think if we wanted to change that it should be done in
another ticket.
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:18 PM, William Bell <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Interesting that facet.method=dv or facet.method=uif. What is the
> difference?
>
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > For those interested I created a separate jira issue for this but forgot
> to
> > attach earlier.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8466
> > On Jan 2, 2016 8:45 PM, "William Bell" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes we would like backward compatibility. We cannot switch all the
> facet
> > > fields to DocValues and our faceting is slow.
> > >
> > > Please...
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there any interest in this? While i think it's important and
> inline
> > > > with faceting available in the new json facet api, I've seen no
> > > discussion
> > > > on it so I'm wondering if it's best I add support for this using a
> > custom
> > > > facet component even though the majority of the component will be a
> > copy
> > > > which is prefer to not need to maintain separately.
> > > >
> > > > Jamie
> > > > On Dec 22, 2015 12:37 PM, "Jamie Johnson" <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I had previously piggybacked on another post, but I think it may
> have
> > > > been
> > > > > lost there. I had a need to do UnInvertedField based faceting in
> the
> > > > > FacetsComponent and as such started looking at what would be
> required
> > > to
> > > > > implement something similar to what the JSON Facets based API does
> in
> > > > this
> > > > > regard. The patch that I have in this regard works and is attached
> > to
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096, is that
> appropriate
> > > or
> > > > > should I create a new ticket to specifically add this support?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Jamie
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bill Bell
> > > billnbell@gmail.com
> > > cell 720-256-8076
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Bill Bell
> billnbell@gmail.com
> cell 720-256-8076
>
Re: Add support in FacetsComponent for facet.method=uif
Posted by William Bell <bi...@gmail.com>.
Interesting that facet.method=dv or facet.method=uif. What is the
difference?
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For those interested I created a separate jira issue for this but forgot to
> attach earlier.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8466
> On Jan 2, 2016 8:45 PM, "William Bell" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes we would like backward compatibility. We cannot switch all the facet
> > fields to DocValues and our faceting is slow.
> >
> > Please...
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any interest in this? While i think it's important and inline
> > > with faceting available in the new json facet api, I've seen no
> > discussion
> > > on it so I'm wondering if it's best I add support for this using a
> custom
> > > facet component even though the majority of the component will be a
> copy
> > > which is prefer to not need to maintain separately.
> > >
> > > Jamie
> > > On Dec 22, 2015 12:37 PM, "Jamie Johnson" <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I had previously piggybacked on another post, but I think it may have
> > > been
> > > > lost there. I had a need to do UnInvertedField based faceting in the
> > > > FacetsComponent and as such started looking at what would be required
> > to
> > > > implement something similar to what the JSON Facets based API does in
> > > this
> > > > regard. The patch that I have in this regard works and is attached
> to
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096, is that appropriate
> > or
> > > > should I create a new ticket to specifically add this support?
> > > >
> > > > -Jamie
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bill Bell
> > billnbell@gmail.com
> > cell 720-256-8076
> >
>
--
Bill Bell
billnbell@gmail.com
cell 720-256-8076
Re: Add support in FacetsComponent for facet.method=uif
Posted by Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com>.
For those interested I created a separate jira issue for this but forgot to
attach earlier.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8466
On Jan 2, 2016 8:45 PM, "William Bell" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes we would like backward compatibility. We cannot switch all the facet
> fields to DocValues and our faceting is slow.
>
> Please...
>
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is there any interest in this? While i think it's important and inline
> > with faceting available in the new json facet api, I've seen no
> discussion
> > on it so I'm wondering if it's best I add support for this using a custom
> > facet component even though the majority of the component will be a copy
> > which is prefer to not need to maintain separately.
> >
> > Jamie
> > On Dec 22, 2015 12:37 PM, "Jamie Johnson" <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I had previously piggybacked on another post, but I think it may have
> > been
> > > lost there. I had a need to do UnInvertedField based faceting in the
> > > FacetsComponent and as such started looking at what would be required
> to
> > > implement something similar to what the JSON Facets based API does in
> > this
> > > regard. The patch that I have in this regard works and is attached to
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096, is that appropriate
> or
> > > should I create a new ticket to specifically add this support?
> > >
> > > -Jamie
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Bill Bell
> billnbell@gmail.com
> cell 720-256-8076
>
Re: Add support in FacetsComponent for facet.method=uif
Posted by William Bell <bi...@gmail.com>.
Yes we would like backward compatibility. We cannot switch all the facet
fields to DocValues and our faceting is slow.
Please...
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any interest in this? While i think it's important and inline
> with faceting available in the new json facet api, I've seen no discussion
> on it so I'm wondering if it's best I add support for this using a custom
> facet component even though the majority of the component will be a copy
> which is prefer to not need to maintain separately.
>
> Jamie
> On Dec 22, 2015 12:37 PM, "Jamie Johnson" <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I had previously piggybacked on another post, but I think it may have
> been
> > lost there. I had a need to do UnInvertedField based faceting in the
> > FacetsComponent and as such started looking at what would be required to
> > implement something similar to what the JSON Facets based API does in
> this
> > regard. The patch that I have in this regard works and is attached to
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096, is that appropriate or
> > should I create a new ticket to specifically add this support?
> >
> > -Jamie
> >
>
--
Bill Bell
billnbell@gmail.com
cell 720-256-8076