You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to user@ofbiz.apache.org by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> on 2009/12/26 14:24:29 UTC

PartyRelationshipType OWNER vs OWNERSHIP

Hi,

As we use PARTNERSHIP, it seems to me that we should better use OWNERSHIP as partyRelationshipTypeId below
    <PartyRelationshipType description="" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" partyRelationshipName="Partner" 
partyRelationshipTypeId="PARTNERSHIP" roleTypeIdValidFrom="" roleTypeIdValidTo=""/>
    <PartyRelationshipType description="" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" partyRelationshipName="Owned by" 
partyRelationshipTypeId="OWNER" roleTypeIdValidFrom="" roleTypeIdValidTo=""/>
As it's not a big deal (but would makes things clearer) I wonder if it's worth to change it since certainly some OFBiz users are 
using OWNER

Opinions?

Jacques

Re: PartyRelationshipType OWNER vs OWNERSHIP

Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.

Yes, it's easier (and safer) to let it as is. It's ok with me

From: "David E Jones" <de...@me.com>
>
> If this seed data is already being used it would be best to not change it.
>
> If you do change it, anyone using it would need to do a data migration.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Dec 26, 2009, at 7:24 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As we use PARTNERSHIP, it seems to me that we should better use OWNERSHIP as partyRelationshipTypeId below
>>   <PartyRelationshipType description="" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" partyRelationshipName="Partner" 
>> partyRelationshipTypeId="PARTNERSHIP" roleTypeIdValidFrom="" roleTypeIdValidTo=""/>
>>   <PartyRelationshipType description="" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" partyRelationshipName="Owned by" 
>> partyRelationshipTypeId="OWNER" roleTypeIdValidFrom="" roleTypeIdValidTo=""/>
>> As it's not a big deal (but would makes things clearer) I wonder if it's worth to change it since certainly some OFBiz users are 
>> using OWNER
>>
>> Opinions?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: PartyRelationshipType OWNER vs OWNERSHIP

Posted by David E Jones <de...@me.com>.

If this seed data is already being used it would be best to not change it.

If you do change it, anyone using it would need to do a data migration.

-David


On Dec 26, 2009, at 7:24 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> As we use PARTNERSHIP, it seems to me that we should better use OWNERSHIP as partyRelationshipTypeId below
>   <PartyRelationshipType description="" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" partyRelationshipName="Partner" partyRelationshipTypeId="PARTNERSHIP" roleTypeIdValidFrom="" roleTypeIdValidTo=""/>
>   <PartyRelationshipType description="" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" partyRelationshipName="Owned by" partyRelationshipTypeId="OWNER" roleTypeIdValidFrom="" roleTypeIdValidTo=""/>
> As it's not a big deal (but would makes things clearer) I wonder if it's worth to change it since certainly some OFBiz users are using OWNER
> 
> Opinions?
> 
> Jacques
> 
> 
>