You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by mffrench <mf...@axway.com> on 2009/03/17 18:25:39 UTC
New question about activemq network
Hello,
I do not understand why the routing is done on the GET and not directly on
the PUT. I do not see the interest to keep the message in the non final
destination broker. For me this is a problem because that's mean if you have
N nodes there will be N-1 get requests for exampke. But there is certainly
some explanations I do not see ? Is there anybody who can explain me the
interest of this kind of routing ?
Thanks for all
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/New-question-about-activemq-network-tp22564076p22564076.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: New question about activemq network
Posted by mffrench <mf...@axway.com>.
This thread comes from a misunderstanding. Please ignore it ;)
++
mffrench wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I do not understand why the routing is done on the GET and not directly on
> the PUT. I do not see the interest to keep the message in the non final
> destination broker. For me this kind of routing raise some questions like
> :
>
> + if you have N nodes if one client get a message from its queue does that
> mean there will be N-1 get request ?
> + is the FIFO ordering in the final queue respected with this kind of
> rounting ?
>
> I think there is certainly some explanations I do not see. Is there
> anybody who can explain me the interest of this kind of routing ?
>
> Thanks for all
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/New-question-about-activemq-network-tp22564076p22660361.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: New question about activemq network
Posted by mffrench <mf...@axway.com>.
UP
mffrench wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I do not understand why the routing is done on the GET and not directly on
> the PUT. I do not see the interest to keep the message in the non final
> destination broker. For me this kind of routing raise some questions like
> :
>
> + if you have N nodes if one client get a message from its queue does that
> mean there will be N-1 get request ?
> + is the FIFO ordering in the final queue respected with this kind of
> rounting ?
>
> I think there is certainly some explanations I do not see. Is there
> anybody who can explain me the interest of this kind of routing ?
>
> Thanks for all
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/New-question-about-activemq-network-tp22564076p22583902.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.