You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-user@axis.apache.org by rahul yadav <ra...@gmail.com> on 2010/02/01 18:35:57 UTC

doc/literal style and wsdl:part combination

Hi All,

Will it be true to say ....If your WSDL is a document-literal style, then
wsdl:part should point to an element instead of type.
And if WSDL is a rpc-enc style, then wsdl:part should point to type.

Re: doc/literal style and wsdl:part combination

Posted by Amila Suriarachchi <am...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:40 PM, rahul yadav <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> one more query on standards....
>
> Can we have multipart messages in wsdl of doc/lit type? As per my
> understanding for multipart messages wsdl should be of rpc/enc type.
>
> If answer for above query is "yes"...then i have seen some wsdls with
> multipart messages following doc/lit style, these wsdls are
> consumed(wsdl2java) well by .net and Axis1.4 but fails with Axis2. how Can
> we justify this ?
>

see R2210 with the same link. There can be only one soap boady child.

thanks,
Amila.

>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Rahul Yadav
>
> Can we have multipart messages in
>
> Following wsdl has multipart messages and is doc/lit type, Axis2 does not support multipart messages in doc/lit wsdl, it has to be a rpc/enc wsdl.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Amila Suriarachchi <
> amilasuriarachchi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:05 PM, rahul yadav <ra...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Will it be true to say ....If your WSDL is a document-literal style, then
>>> wsdl:part should point to an element instead of type.
>>>
>> yes.
>> see [1] R2204 and R2203. if it is rpc-literal the part should refer to a
>> type.
>>
>> basic profile does not talk about rpc-enc
>>
>> thanks,
>> Amila.
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1.html#Bindings_and_Parts
>>
>>> And if WSDL is a rpc-enc style, then wsdl:part should point to type.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Amila Suriarachchi
>> WSO2 Inc.
>> blog: http://amilachinthaka.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>


-- 
Amila Suriarachchi
WSO2 Inc.
blog: http://amilachinthaka.blogspot.com/

Re: doc/literal style and wsdl:part combination

Posted by rahul yadav <ra...@gmail.com>.
one more query on standards....

Can we have multipart messages in wsdl of doc/lit type? As per my
understanding for multipart messages wsdl should be of rpc/enc type.

If answer for above query is "yes"...then i have seen some wsdls with
multipart messages following doc/lit style, these wsdls are
consumed(wsdl2java) well by .net and Axis1.4 but fails with Axis2. how Can
we justify this ?

Thanks & Regards,
Rahul Yadav

Can we have multipart messages in

Following wsdl has multipart messages and is doc/lit type, Axis2 does
not support multipart messages in doc/lit wsdl, it has to be a rpc/enc
wsdl.



On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Amila Suriarachchi <
amilasuriarachchi@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:05 PM, rahul yadav <ra...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Will it be true to say ....If your WSDL is a document-literal style, then
>> wsdl:part should point to an element instead of type.
>>
> yes.
> see [1] R2204 and R2203. if it is rpc-literal the part should refer to a
> type.
>
> basic profile does not talk about rpc-enc
>
> thanks,
> Amila.
>
>
> [1] http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1.html#Bindings_and_Parts
>
>> And if WSDL is a rpc-enc style, then wsdl:part should point to type.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Amila Suriarachchi
> WSO2 Inc.
> blog: http://amilachinthaka.blogspot.com/
>

Web service client and HTTP redirects

Posted by Nadir Amra <am...@us.ibm.com>.
Does Axis2 Web service client support HTTP redirects?  If so, how does it 
process the various status codes? or can you point me to the code? 

Thanks in advance

Nadir Amra

Re: doc/literal style and wsdl:part combination

Posted by Amila Suriarachchi <am...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:05 PM, rahul yadav <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Will it be true to say ....If your WSDL is a document-literal style, then
> wsdl:part should point to an element instead of type.
>
yes.
see [1] R2204 and R2203. if it is rpc-literal the part should refer to a
type.

basic profile does not talk about rpc-enc

thanks,
Amila.


[1] http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1.html#Bindings_and_Parts

> And if WSDL is a rpc-enc style, then wsdl:part should point to type.
>
>
>
>


-- 
Amila Suriarachchi
WSO2 Inc.
blog: http://amilachinthaka.blogspot.com/