You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Nicolas Liochon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/10/16 18:43:47 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-9775) Client write path perf issues
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13796955#comment-13796955 ]
Nicolas Liochon edited comment on HBASE-9775 at 10/16/13 4:42 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
bq. 1024 threads on a client just seems excessive
I fully agree, but do you know how many threads you have on the 0.94 during the test? we're not bounded there iirc, so as the workload is random i would expect all batch calls to go on all servers.
was (Author: nkeywal):
bq. 1024 threads on a client just seems excessive
I fully agree, but do you how many threads do you have on the 0.94 during the test? we're not bounded there iirc, so as the workload is random i would expect all batch calls to go on all servers.
> Client write path perf issues
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9775
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9775
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client
> Affects Versions: 0.96.0
> Reporter: Elliott Clark
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: Charts Search Cloudera Manager.png, short_ycsb.png, ycsb_insert_94_vs_96.png
>
>
> Testing on larger clusters has not had the desired throughput increases.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)