You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@ant.apache.org by Maurice Naftalin <ma...@morninglight.co.uk> on 2002/04/22 12:28:35 UTC
"subpackages" option needed in javadoc?
I'm inexperienced with ant, so apologies if this has an obvious answer.
I have an unusual problem in using jdk1.4 javadoc, caused by having a
package whose name ends in "java" (there is really a good reason for
this, and in any case I can't change it now). This wasn't a problem in
1.3, but 1.4 javadoc insists on assuming that this package is actually
a java file. I can persuade it otherwise by using the subpackages
option, but ant doesn't know about that and can't supply it. Is there
any workaround for this problem, or do I have to abandon using ant for
this task?
Thanks in advance
Maurice
-----------------
Maurice Naftalin, Morningside Light Ltd., 48 Comiston Road,
Edinburgh EH10 5QQ
Tel: 0131 466 7059
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: "subpackages" option needed in javadoc?
Posted by Maurice Naftalin <ma...@morninglight.co.uk>.
At 18:22 22/04/02 -0700, you wrote:
>--- Maurice Naftalin <ma...@morninglight.co.uk> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > a java file. I can persuade it otherwise by using the subpackages
> > option, but ant doesn't know about that and can't supply it. Is there
> > any workaround for this problem, or do I have to abandon using ant for
> > this task?
>
>Would the 'additionalparam' attribute work for you?
>
>Diane
Oh, I missed that one. Yes, it does work for me - thanks very much.
Maurice
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: "subpackages" option needed in javadoc?
Posted by Diane Holt <ho...@yahoo.com>.
--- Maurice Naftalin <ma...@morninglight.co.uk> wrote:
> I have an unusual problem in using jdk1.4 javadoc, caused by having a
> package whose name ends in "java" (there is really a good reason for
> this, and in any case I can't change it now). This wasn't a problem in
> 1.3, but 1.4 javadoc insists on assuming that this package is actually
> a java file. I can persuade it otherwise by using the subpackages
> option, but ant doesn't know about that and can't supply it. Is there
> any workaround for this problem, or do I have to abandon using ant for
> this task?
Would the 'additionalparam' attribute work for you?
Diane
=====
(holtdl@yahoo.com)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
http://games.yahoo.com/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>