You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pulsar.apache.org by Xiangying Meng <xi...@apache.org> on 2024/01/16 06:40:58 UTC
[VOTE]PIP-321: Split the responsibilities of namespace replication-clusters
Dear Pulsar community,
I am initiating a voting thread for "PIP-321: Split the responsibilities of
namespace replication-clusters".
Here is the pull request for PIP-321:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21648
And the discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/87qfp8ht5s0fvw2y4t3j9yzgfmdzmcnz
Highlight:
This proposal introduces a new feature for topics, allowing a topic to be
loaded across different clusters without data replication between these
clusters. It also introduces more granular control over `allowed_clusters`
at the namespace level.
Please review the PIP document and cast your vote!
Thank you,
Xiangying
Re: [VOTE]PIP-321: Split the responsibilities of namespace replication-clusters
Posted by PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 4:00 PM guo jiwei <te...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 2:41 PM Xiangying Meng <xi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Pulsar community,
> >
> > I am initiating a voting thread for "PIP-321: Split the responsibilities
> of
> > namespace replication-clusters".
> >
> > Here is the pull request for PIP-321:
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21648
> >
> > And the discussion thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/87qfp8ht5s0fvw2y4t3j9yzgfmdzmcnz
> >
> > Highlight:
> > This proposal introduces a new feature for topics, allowing a topic to be
> > loaded across different clusters without data replication between these
> > clusters. It also introduces more granular control over
> `allowed_clusters`
> > at the namespace level.
> >
> > Please review the PIP document and cast your vote!
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Xiangying
> >
>
Re: [VOTE]PIP-321: Split the responsibilities of namespace replication-clusters
Posted by guo jiwei <te...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 2:41 PM Xiangying Meng <xi...@apache.org> wrote:
> Dear Pulsar community,
>
> I am initiating a voting thread for "PIP-321: Split the responsibilities of
> namespace replication-clusters".
>
> Here is the pull request for PIP-321:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21648
>
> And the discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/87qfp8ht5s0fvw2y4t3j9yzgfmdzmcnz
>
> Highlight:
> This proposal introduces a new feature for topics, allowing a topic to be
> loaded across different clusters without data replication between these
> clusters. It also introduces more granular control over `allowed_clusters`
> at the namespace level.
>
> Please review the PIP document and cast your vote!
>
> Thank you,
>
> Xiangying
>
Re: [VOTE]PIP-321: Split the responsibilities of namespace replication-clusters
Posted by Xiangying Meng <xi...@apache.org>.
Close this vote with three bindings.
- Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
- Penghui
- Yubiao Feng
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 6:31 PM Yubiao Feng
<yu...@streamnative.io.invalid> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks
> Yubiao Feng
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 2:41 PM Xiangying Meng <xi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Pulsar community,
> >
> > I am initiating a voting thread for "PIP-321: Split the responsibilities
> of
> > namespace replication-clusters".
> >
> > Here is the pull request for PIP-321:
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21648
> >
> > And the discussion thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/87qfp8ht5s0fvw2y4t3j9yzgfmdzmcnz
> >
> > Highlight:
> > This proposal introduces a new feature for topics, allowing a topic to be
> > loaded across different clusters without data replication between these
> > clusters. It also introduces more granular control over
> `allowed_clusters`
> > at the namespace level.
> >
> > Please review the PIP document and cast your vote!
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Xiangying
> >
>
Re: [VOTE]PIP-321: Split the responsibilities of namespace replication-clusters
Posted by Yubiao Feng <yu...@streamnative.io.INVALID>.
+1 (binding)
Thanks
Yubiao Feng
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 2:41 PM Xiangying Meng <xi...@apache.org> wrote:
> Dear Pulsar community,
>
> I am initiating a voting thread for "PIP-321: Split the responsibilities of
> namespace replication-clusters".
>
> Here is the pull request for PIP-321:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21648
>
> And the discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/87qfp8ht5s0fvw2y4t3j9yzgfmdzmcnz
>
> Highlight:
> This proposal introduces a new feature for topics, allowing a topic to be
> loaded across different clusters without data replication between these
> clusters. It also introduces more granular control over `allowed_clusters`
> at the namespace level.
>
> Please review the PIP document and cast your vote!
>
> Thank you,
>
> Xiangying
>