RE: VelocityServlet.handleRequest

["Geir Magnusson Jr." <gm...@xyris.com>]

> From: Shahar Solomianik [mailto:shahar@tikalknowledge.com]
>
> Just curious, Why isnt this method declared with throws clause ?

It is now...  update what you have from CVS, or wait until the 1.0.1 release
tonight.

geir

Re: Configuration stuff

[Daniel Rall <dl...@collab.net>]

"Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@optonline.net> writes:

> There was some talk of going the other way, taking the Turbine/Velocity
> Configuration class and taking that over to Jakarta Commons.

I would like to see that happen.  I find it really odd that Turbine
uses the Configuration class from the Velocity JAR as a core class.
It is currently impossible to run Turbine without a Velocity JAR
present.  I am also loath to just duplicate the code.  The code in
Configuration is very good--a lot of projects could reap the benefit
of it.

Dan

Re: Configuration stuff

["Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@optonline.net>]

Paulo Gaspar wrote:
> 
> I have been staring at Avalon's configuration stuff.
> 
> Nice abstractions, and it could also be implemented
> with properties (already is with XML).
> 
> Does anyone here know the interfaces at
>   org.apache.avalon.configuration?
>

I don't.

> Aren't these reusable here in the future?
> 

Heh.  didn't we just go through this? :)

There was some talk of going the other way, taking the Turbine/Velocity
Configuration class and taking that over to Jakarta Commons.

geir

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr.                               geirm@optonline.net
Developing for the web?  See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/

Configuration stuff

[Paulo Gaspar <pa...@krankikom.de>]

I have been staring at Avalon's configuration stuff.

Nice abstractions, and it could also be implemented 
with properties (already is with XML).

Does anyone here know the interfaces at 
  org.apache.avalon.configuration?

Aren't these reusable here in the future?


Have fun,
Paulo