You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@kafka.apache.org by "C0urante (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/05/30 15:55:27 UTC

[GitHub] [kafka] C0urante commented on a diff in pull request #13776: KAFKA-15034: Improve performance of the ReplaceField SMT; add JMH benchmark

C0urante commented on code in PR #13776:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13776#discussion_r1210481491


##########
jmh-benchmarks/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/jmh/connect/ReplaceFieldBenchmark.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.kafka.jmh.connect;
+
+import org.apache.kafka.connect.source.SourceRecord;
+import org.apache.kafka.connect.transforms.ReplaceField;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Benchmark;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.BenchmarkMode;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Fork;

Review Comment:
   (To match the suggestion below RE an explicit setup level)
   ```suggestion
   import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Fork;
   import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Level;
   ```



##########
jmh-benchmarks/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/jmh/connect/ReplaceFieldBenchmark.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.kafka.jmh.connect;
+
+import org.apache.kafka.connect.source.SourceRecord;
+import org.apache.kafka.connect.transforms.ReplaceField;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Benchmark;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.BenchmarkMode;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Fork;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Measurement;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Mode;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.OutputTimeUnit;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Param;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Scope;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Setup;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.State;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Warmup;
+
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
+import java.util.stream.Collectors;
+import java.util.stream.IntStream;
+
+
+/**
+ * This benchmark tests the performance of the {@link ReplaceField} {@link org.apache.kafka.connect.transforms.Transformation SMT}
+ * when configured with a large number of include and exclude fields and applied on a {@link SourceRecord} containing a similarly
+ * large number of fields.
+ */
+@State(Scope.Benchmark)
+@Fork(value = 1)
+@Warmup(iterations = 3)
+@Measurement(iterations = 5)
+@BenchmarkMode(Mode.AverageTime)
+@OutputTimeUnit(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS)
+public class ReplaceFieldBenchmark {
+
+    @Param({"100", "1000", "10000"})
+    private int fieldCount;
+    private ReplaceField<SourceRecord> replaceFieldSmt;
+    private SourceRecord record;
+
+    @Setup

Review Comment:
   In most other benchmarks we're explicit about the setup level, even if it matches the default:
   ```suggestion
       @Setup(Level.Trial)
   ```



##########
connect/transforms/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/connect/transforms/ReplaceField.java:
##########
@@ -94,8 +96,8 @@ public void configure(Map<String, ?> configs) {
             {ConfigName.EXCLUDE, "blacklist"},
         }));
 
-        exclude = config.getList(ConfigName.EXCLUDE);
-        include = config.getList(ConfigName.INCLUDE);
+        exclude = new HashSet<>(config.getList(ConfigName.EXCLUDE));
+        include = new HashSet<>(config.getList(ConfigName.INCLUDE));

Review Comment:
   Is it possible that there's a performance penalty for this approach when the transform has been configured with a small number of include/exclude fields (e.g., 1), since we'd have to compute the hash code of each field in the value?



##########
jmh-benchmarks/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/jmh/connect/ReplaceFieldBenchmark.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.kafka.jmh.connect;
+
+import org.apache.kafka.connect.source.SourceRecord;
+import org.apache.kafka.connect.transforms.ReplaceField;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Benchmark;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.BenchmarkMode;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Fork;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Measurement;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Mode;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.OutputTimeUnit;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Param;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Scope;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Setup;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.State;
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Warmup;
+
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
+import java.util.stream.Collectors;
+import java.util.stream.IntStream;
+
+
+/**
+ * This benchmark tests the performance of the {@link ReplaceField} {@link org.apache.kafka.connect.transforms.Transformation SMT}
+ * when configured with a large number of include and exclude fields and applied on a {@link SourceRecord} containing a similarly
+ * large number of fields.
+ */
+@State(Scope.Benchmark)
+@Fork(value = 1)
+@Warmup(iterations = 3)
+@Measurement(iterations = 5)
+@BenchmarkMode(Mode.AverageTime)
+@OutputTimeUnit(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS)
+public class ReplaceFieldBenchmark {
+
+    @Param({"100", "1000", "10000"})
+    private int fieldCount;
+    private ReplaceField<SourceRecord> replaceFieldSmt;
+    private SourceRecord record;
+
+    @Setup
+    public void setup() {
+        this.replaceFieldSmt = new ReplaceField.Value<>();
+        Map<String, String> replaceFieldConfigs = new HashMap<>();
+        replaceFieldConfigs.put("exclude",
+                IntStream.range(0, fieldCount).filter(x -> (x & 1) == 0).mapToObj(x -> "Field-" + x).collect(Collectors.joining(",")));
+        replaceFieldConfigs.put("include",
+                IntStream.range(0, fieldCount).filter(x -> (x & 1) == 1).mapToObj(x -> "Field-" + x).collect(Collectors.joining(",")));

Review Comment:
   We may want to add a separate parameter for the number of included/excluded fields (can be a single parameter to control both, or a separate parameter for each) in order to cover the case of a value with a large number of fields and a small number of included/excluded fields.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscribe@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org