You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bval.apache.org by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> on 2010/11/04 21:23:25 UTC
[DISCUSS] Timing for a 0.3-incubating release?
We have 3 issues (BVAL-60, BVAL-84, BVAL-85) fixed in trunk so far
(along with other code cleanup/fixes from Matt) and 2 others (BVAL-63
and BVAL-82) tagged for 0.3. Does anyone have other issues they'd like
to see fixed before we cut a 0.3 release later this month?
-Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Timing for a 0.3-incubating release?
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
I've started updating the release notes and JIRA for a 0.3-incubating
release, so please hold off on any commits for the next few hours.
Thanks,
Donald
On 11/4/10 4:23 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> We have 3 issues (BVAL-60, BVAL-84, BVAL-85) fixed in trunk so far
> (along with other code cleanup/fixes from Matt) and 2 others (BVAL-63
> and BVAL-82) tagged for 0.3. Does anyone have other issues they'd like
> to see fixed before we cut a 0.3 release later this month?
>
> -Donald
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Timing for a 0.3-incubating release?
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
Hi Donald,
+1 for me, unfortunately I haven't had enough spare time for adding
stuff to the extras module, so please keep it out from the release.
Once released the 0.3, I intend to port the current guice integration
module to pure JSR330 integration (Guice 3.0) and adding the extras.
Of course, any kind of help is more than appreciated.
Have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> PS: and welcome back ;)
>
> --- On Tue, 1/18/11, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Timing for a 0.3-incubating release?
>> To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Date: Tuesday, January 18, 2011, 12:23 PM
>> OK, I think we've given everyone
>> enough time to commit changes, so after
>> I verify the current trunk passes the TCK on my machine,
>> I'll start
>> cutting a 0.3-incubating release.
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> On 11/4/10 4:23 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> > We have 3 issues (BVAL-60, BVAL-84, BVAL-85) fixed in
>> trunk so far
>> > (along with other code cleanup/fixes from Matt) and 2
>> others (BVAL-63
>> > and BVAL-82) tagged for 0.3. Does anyone have
>> other issues they'd like
>> > to see fixed before we cut a 0.3 release later this
>> month?
>> >
>> > -Donald
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Timing for a 0.3-incubating release?
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
+1
LieGrue,
strub
PS: and welcome back ;)
--- On Tue, 1/18/11, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> From: Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Timing for a 0.3-incubating release?
> To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Tuesday, January 18, 2011, 12:23 PM
> OK, I think we've given everyone
> enough time to commit changes, so after
> I verify the current trunk passes the TCK on my machine,
> I'll start
> cutting a 0.3-incubating release.
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 11/4/10 4:23 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> > We have 3 issues (BVAL-60, BVAL-84, BVAL-85) fixed in
> trunk so far
> > (along with other code cleanup/fixes from Matt) and 2
> others (BVAL-63
> > and BVAL-82) tagged for 0.3. Does anyone have
> other issues they'd like
> > to see fixed before we cut a 0.3 release later this
> month?
> >
> > -Donald
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Timing for a 0.3-incubating release?
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
OK, I think we've given everyone enough time to commit changes, so after
I verify the current trunk passes the TCK on my machine, I'll start
cutting a 0.3-incubating release.
-Donald
On 11/4/10 4:23 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> We have 3 issues (BVAL-60, BVAL-84, BVAL-85) fixed in trunk so far
> (along with other code cleanup/fixes from Matt) and 2 others (BVAL-63
> and BVAL-82) tagged for 0.3. Does anyone have other issues they'd like
> to see fixed before we cut a 0.3 release later this month?
>
> -Donald
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Timing for a 0.3-incubating release?
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@gmail.com>.
Hi all guys,
what about open unscheduled issues[1]? BTW I don't see any other
blocking issue to publish a new release.
Have a nice day,
Simo
[1] http://s.apache.org/Of3
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> OK, thanks for the feedback.
>
> Anyone else? :-)
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 11/10/10 6:00 PM, Carlos Vara wrote:
>> No extra issues I would like to see fixed, so I'm all for cutting a new
>> release once BVAL-82 is resolved.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> We have 3 issues (BVAL-60, BVAL-84, BVAL-85) fixed in trunk so far
>>> (along with other code cleanup/fixes from Matt) and 2 others (BVAL-63
>>> and BVAL-82) tagged for 0.3. Does anyone have other issues they'd like
>>> to see fixed before we cut a 0.3 release later this month?
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Timing for a 0.3-incubating release?
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
OK, thanks for the feedback.
Anyone else? :-)
-Donald
On 11/10/10 6:00 PM, Carlos Vara wrote:
> No extra issues I would like to see fixed, so I'm all for cutting a new
> release once BVAL-82 is resolved.
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> We have 3 issues (BVAL-60, BVAL-84, BVAL-85) fixed in trunk so far
>> (along with other code cleanup/fixes from Matt) and 2 others (BVAL-63
>> and BVAL-82) tagged for 0.3. Does anyone have other issues they'd like
>> to see fixed before we cut a 0.3 release later this month?
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Timing for a 0.3-incubating release?
Posted by Carlos Vara <ba...@gmail.com>.
No extra issues I would like to see fixed, so I'm all for cutting a new
release once BVAL-82 is resolved.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> We have 3 issues (BVAL-60, BVAL-84, BVAL-85) fixed in trunk so far
> (along with other code cleanup/fixes from Matt) and 2 others (BVAL-63
> and BVAL-82) tagged for 0.3. Does anyone have other issues they'd like
> to see fixed before we cut a 0.3 release later this month?
>
> -Donald
>