You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by RaghuBaddam <ra...@gmail.com> on 2016/07/01 00:28:56 UTC
Need help to Improve ActiveMQ performance
Hi,
I am testing ActiveMQ and the performance is too low if I use
enableJournalDiskSyncs (400 msgs / sec of 10kb) and If I disable
enableJournalDiskSyncs (4000 msgs / sec of 10kb) It is really 10times
increase in performance, I tuned almost all the ActiveMQ parameters but It
is not giving any better results, I know that If I enable
concurrentStoreAndDispatchQueues, we will get good results but before that I
want to understand that, Is there any other way we can Increase our
performance(I know using Transacted session is an option but we have
multiple applications so we can’t Insist everyone to use Transacted session
:( )
Is there there any way we can avoid fsync each time with no message loss ?
We are trying to reach a point where there is No message loss and Good
performance with ActiveMQ.
Basically we are migrating from Tibco EMS to ActiveMQ, so we really need
your help.
Thanks in Advance
Raghu Baddam
-----
Raghu Baddam
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Need-help-to-Improve-ActiveMQ-performance-tp4713527.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Need help to Improve ActiveMQ performance
Posted by Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>.
Hi Raghu,
It may also be worth considering ActiveMQ Artemis in your evaluation. It
has a complete blocking architecture end to end and can delivery excellent
performance.
https://activemq.apache.org/artemis/
Regards
Martyn
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> to have a guarantee the fsync is necessary. possibly move the index to a
> separate disk to reduce contention. To boost throughput, have multiple
> connections publishing at the same time. In this way, multiple parallel
> sends will get the benefit of a batched fsync.
>
>
> On Sat, 2 Jul 2016 at 19:32 RaghuBaddam <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am testing ActiveMQ and the performance is too low if I use
> > enableJournalDiskSyncs (400 msgs / sec of 10kb) and If I disable
> > enableJournalDiskSyncs (4000 msgs / sec of 10kb) It is really 10times
> > increase in performance, I tuned almost all the ActiveMQ parameters but
> It
> > is not giving any better results, I know that If I enable
> > concurrentStoreAndDispatchQueues, we will get good results but before
> that
> > I
> > want to understand that, Is there any other way we can Increase our
> > performance(I know using Transacted session is an option but we have
> > multiple applications so we can’t Insist everyone to use Transacted
> session
> > :( )
> >
> > Is there there any way we can avoid fsync each time with no message loss
> ?
> >
> > We are trying to reach a point where there is No message loss and Good
> > performance with ActiveMQ.
> >
> > Basically we are migrating from Tibco EMS to ActiveMQ, so we really need
> > your help.
> >
> > Thanks in Advance
> > Raghu Baddam
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > Raghu Baddam
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Need-help-to-Improve-ActiveMQ-performance-tp4713527.html
> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
Re: Need help to Improve ActiveMQ performance
Posted by Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com>.
to have a guarantee the fsync is necessary. possibly move the index to a
separate disk to reduce contention. To boost throughput, have multiple
connections publishing at the same time. In this way, multiple parallel
sends will get the benefit of a batched fsync.
On Sat, 2 Jul 2016 at 19:32 RaghuBaddam <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am testing ActiveMQ and the performance is too low if I use
> enableJournalDiskSyncs (400 msgs / sec of 10kb) and If I disable
> enableJournalDiskSyncs (4000 msgs / sec of 10kb) It is really 10times
> increase in performance, I tuned almost all the ActiveMQ parameters but It
> is not giving any better results, I know that If I enable
> concurrentStoreAndDispatchQueues, we will get good results but before that
> I
> want to understand that, Is there any other way we can Increase our
> performance(I know using Transacted session is an option but we have
> multiple applications so we can’t Insist everyone to use Transacted session
> :( )
>
> Is there there any way we can avoid fsync each time with no message loss ?
>
> We are trying to reach a point where there is No message loss and Good
> performance with ActiveMQ.
>
> Basically we are migrating from Tibco EMS to ActiveMQ, so we really need
> your help.
>
> Thanks in Advance
> Raghu Baddam
>
>
>
> -----
> Raghu Baddam
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Need-help-to-Improve-ActiveMQ-performance-tp4713527.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>