You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beam.apache.org by Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> on 2018/04/17 20:55:56 UTC

[PROPOSAL] JIRA notification recipient changes

Hi all,

Currently, every touch on a JIRA causes four notifications:

 - all watchers
 - current assignee
 - reporter
 - commits@beam.apache.org

I think there are redundancies and imperfections here. If you report a bug
you cannot later unsubscribe from it! I may be disproportionately spammed
here... I try to compensate with filters, but it is not easy to get the
effect I want except by ignoring all JIRA.

I propose:

 - all watchers
 - current assignee
 - issues@beam.apache.org (any ASF member or PMC chair can set up quickly,
yes?)

This way, you can report bugs and unwatch them. And if you do want the
firehose of issues it is trivial to separate from commits.

I think this goes through INFRA ticket or maybe any ASF member or PMC chair
can do the whole thing?

Kenn

Re: [PROPOSAL] JIRA notification recipient changes

Posted by Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>.
I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16683 to get some info
/ feedback from INFRA. After a bit of searching, the ideal that Davor
described is definitely possible and even normal.

Kenn

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:33 PM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:

> Yea, the separation of commits@ and issues@ was just a nice thing to make
> both more readable. I could imagine looking at issues@ once in a while,
> but never commits@. Not terribly important. But separating watching and
> reporter is very helpful. Both devs and users may not want to actually
> track something forever just because they found it or thought of it.
>
> Kenn
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:05 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> commits@ or dev@ are common choices. Others are generally redundant or
>> means it is ignored by everybody which is fine but means you just drop
>> notif from jira instead of redirecting them ;)
>>
>> Just my 2 cts
>>
>> Le 18 avr. 2018 20:55, "Kenneth Knowles" <kl...@google.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> Annoyingly, it appears that the reporter is not automatically a watcher.
>>> It is incorrect that it is a strict degradation, but I agree that it is not
>>> a good change to make since it favors devs over users. I will chat with
>>> infra about whether we can set up the best case.
>>>
>>> In the meantime, perhaps I'll create a separate account for filing
>>> JIRAs...
>>>
>>> Kenn
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:56 AM Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> An INFRA ticket is needed.
>>>>
>>>> (As long as the report is automatically a watcher, the change is a
>>>> strict improvement. If not, it's a strict degradation.)
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently, every touch on a JIRA causes four notifications:
>>>>>
>>>>>  - all watchers
>>>>>  - current assignee
>>>>>  - reporter
>>>>>  - commits@beam.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>> I think there are redundancies and imperfections here. If you report a
>>>>> bug you cannot later unsubscribe from it! I may be disproportionately
>>>>> spammed here... I try to compensate with filters, but it is not easy to get
>>>>> the effect I want except by ignoring all JIRA.
>>>>>
>>>>> I propose:
>>>>>
>>>>>  - all watchers
>>>>>  - current assignee
>>>>>  - issues@beam.apache.org (any ASF member or PMC chair can set up
>>>>> quickly, yes?)
>>>>>
>>>>> This way, you can report bugs and unwatch them. And if you do want the
>>>>> firehose of issues it is trivial to separate from commits.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this goes through INFRA ticket or maybe any ASF member or PMC
>>>>> chair can do the whole thing?
>>>>>
>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

Re: [PROPOSAL] JIRA notification recipient changes

Posted by Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>.
Yea, the separation of commits@ and issues@ was just a nice thing to make
both more readable. I could imagine looking at issues@ once in a while, but
never commits@. Not terribly important. But separating watching and
reporter is very helpful. Both devs and users may not want to actually
track something forever just because they found it or thought of it.

Kenn

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:05 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> commits@ or dev@ are common choices. Others are generally redundant or
> means it is ignored by everybody which is fine but means you just drop
> notif from jira instead of redirecting them ;)
>
> Just my 2 cts
>
> Le 18 avr. 2018 20:55, "Kenneth Knowles" <kl...@google.com> a écrit :
>
>> Annoyingly, it appears that the reporter is not automatically a watcher.
>> It is incorrect that it is a strict degradation, but I agree that it is not
>> a good change to make since it favors devs over users. I will chat with
>> infra about whether we can set up the best case.
>>
>> In the meantime, perhaps I'll create a separate account for filing
>> JIRAs...
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:56 AM Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> An INFRA ticket is needed.
>>>
>>> (As long as the report is automatically a watcher, the change is a
>>> strict improvement. If not, it's a strict degradation.)
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Currently, every touch on a JIRA causes four notifications:
>>>>
>>>>  - all watchers
>>>>  - current assignee
>>>>  - reporter
>>>>  - commits@beam.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> I think there are redundancies and imperfections here. If you report a
>>>> bug you cannot later unsubscribe from it! I may be disproportionately
>>>> spammed here... I try to compensate with filters, but it is not easy to get
>>>> the effect I want except by ignoring all JIRA.
>>>>
>>>> I propose:
>>>>
>>>>  - all watchers
>>>>  - current assignee
>>>>  - issues@beam.apache.org (any ASF member or PMC chair can set up
>>>> quickly, yes?)
>>>>
>>>> This way, you can report bugs and unwatch them. And if you do want the
>>>> firehose of issues it is trivial to separate from commits.
>>>>
>>>> I think this goes through INFRA ticket or maybe any ASF member or PMC
>>>> chair can do the whole thing?
>>>>
>>>> Kenn
>>>>
>>>
>>>

Re: [PROPOSAL] JIRA notification recipient changes

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
commits@ or dev@ are common choices. Others are generally redundant or
means it is ignored by everybody which is fine but means you just drop
notif from jira instead of redirecting them ;)

Just my 2 cts

Le 18 avr. 2018 20:55, "Kenneth Knowles" <kl...@google.com> a écrit :

> Annoyingly, it appears that the reporter is not automatically a watcher.
> It is incorrect that it is a strict degradation, but I agree that it is not
> a good change to make since it favors devs over users. I will chat with
> infra about whether we can set up the best case.
>
> In the meantime, perhaps I'll create a separate account for filing JIRAs...
>
> Kenn
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:56 AM Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> An INFRA ticket is needed.
>>
>> (As long as the report is automatically a watcher, the change is a strict
>> improvement. If not, it's a strict degradation.)
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Currently, every touch on a JIRA causes four notifications:
>>>
>>>  - all watchers
>>>  - current assignee
>>>  - reporter
>>>  - commits@beam.apache.org
>>>
>>> I think there are redundancies and imperfections here. If you report a
>>> bug you cannot later unsubscribe from it! I may be disproportionately
>>> spammed here... I try to compensate with filters, but it is not easy to get
>>> the effect I want except by ignoring all JIRA.
>>>
>>> I propose:
>>>
>>>  - all watchers
>>>  - current assignee
>>>  - issues@beam.apache.org (any ASF member or PMC chair can set up
>>> quickly, yes?)
>>>
>>> This way, you can report bugs and unwatch them. And if you do want the
>>> firehose of issues it is trivial to separate from commits.
>>>
>>> I think this goes through INFRA ticket or maybe any ASF member or PMC
>>> chair can do the whole thing?
>>>
>>> Kenn
>>>
>>
>>

Re: [PROPOSAL] JIRA notification recipient changes

Posted by Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>.
Annoyingly, it appears that the reporter is not automatically a watcher. It
is incorrect that it is a strict degradation, but I agree that it is not a
good change to make since it favors devs over users. I will chat with infra
about whether we can set up the best case.

In the meantime, perhaps I'll create a separate account for filing JIRAs...

Kenn

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:56 AM Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote:

> An INFRA ticket is needed.
>
> (As long as the report is automatically a watcher, the change is a strict
> improvement. If not, it's a strict degradation.)
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Currently, every touch on a JIRA causes four notifications:
>>
>>  - all watchers
>>  - current assignee
>>  - reporter
>>  - commits@beam.apache.org
>>
>> I think there are redundancies and imperfections here. If you report a
>> bug you cannot later unsubscribe from it! I may be disproportionately
>> spammed here... I try to compensate with filters, but it is not easy to get
>> the effect I want except by ignoring all JIRA.
>>
>> I propose:
>>
>>  - all watchers
>>  - current assignee
>>  - issues@beam.apache.org (any ASF member or PMC chair can set up
>> quickly, yes?)
>>
>> This way, you can report bugs and unwatch them. And if you do want the
>> firehose of issues it is trivial to separate from commits.
>>
>> I think this goes through INFRA ticket or maybe any ASF member or PMC
>> chair can do the whole thing?
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>
>

Re: [PROPOSAL] JIRA notification recipient changes

Posted by Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>.
An INFRA ticket is needed.

(As long as the report is automatically a watcher, the change is a strict
improvement. If not, it's a strict degradation.)

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Currently, every touch on a JIRA causes four notifications:
>
>  - all watchers
>  - current assignee
>  - reporter
>  - commits@beam.apache.org
>
> I think there are redundancies and imperfections here. If you report a bug
> you cannot later unsubscribe from it! I may be disproportionately spammed
> here... I try to compensate with filters, but it is not easy to get the
> effect I want except by ignoring all JIRA.
>
> I propose:
>
>  - all watchers
>  - current assignee
>  - issues@beam.apache.org (any ASF member or PMC chair can set up
> quickly, yes?)
>
> This way, you can report bugs and unwatch them. And if you do want the
> firehose of issues it is trivial to separate from commits.
>
> I think this goes through INFRA ticket or maybe any ASF member or PMC
> chair can do the whole thing?
>
> Kenn
>