You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Manoj Kasichainula <ma...@io.com> on 1999/10/29 07:06:39 UTC

ap_block_alarms still necessary?

There are still scattered references to ap_block_alarms. Are any of
them still needed? The two threaded Unix MPMs don't need them at all.

-- 
Manoj Kasichainula - manojk at io dot com - http://www.io.com/~manojk/

Re: ap_block_alarms still necessary?

Posted by Tony Finch <do...@dotat.at>.

Manoj Kasichainula <ma...@io.com> wrote:
>There are still scattered references to ap_block_alarms. Are any of
>them still needed? The two threaded Unix MPMs don't need them at all.

If the intention is still to get rid off all the asynchronous stuff
then they are not needed.

Tony.
-- 
dot it thus

Re: ap_block_alarms still necessary?

Posted by Dean Gaudet <dg...@arctic.org>.

they're not needed... prefork doesn't require them either.

Dean

On Fri, 29 Oct 1999, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:

> There are still scattered references to ap_block_alarms. Are any of
> them still needed? The two threaded Unix MPMs don't need them at all.
> 
> -- 
> Manoj Kasichainula - manojk at io dot com - http://www.io.com/~manojk/
>