You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Andrew Purtell <ap...@yahoo.com> on 2010/03/18 19:57:59 UTC
Re: [MORE DISCUSSION] Moving hbase trunk (temporarily) back to hadoop 0.20.x (from head of the hadoop 0.21 branch)
+1
Thanks, this means I can get off of branch for dev and move back to trunk.
- Andy
> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> Subject: [MORE DISCUSSION] Moving hbase trunk (temporarily) back to hadoop 0.20.x (from head of the hadoop 0.21 branch)
> To: "HBase Dev List" <hb...@hadoop.apache.org>
> Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 11:28 AM
>
> Unless there is objection, in the next day or so, I'd like
> to revert the hadoop that is in hbase trunk and replace it
> with hadoop 0.20.2.
Re: [MORE DISCUSSION] Moving hbase trunk (temporarily) back to hadoop
0.20.x (from head of the hadoop 0.21 branch)
Posted by Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com>.
I've committed this as SVN revision # 926397.
As part of the change I built this version of hadoop:
http://github.com/ryanobjc/hadoop-common/commits/hadoop-0.20.2-with-200-826
And it is published:
http://people.apache.org/~rawson/repo/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-core/0.20.2-with-200-826/
and
http://people.apache.org/~rawson/repo/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-test/0.20.2-with-200-826/
So to build a hadoop with the precise version that HBase trunk now
depends on, you can git clone my repo above and do 'ant tar' to get
yourself a hadoop 0.20.2 + HDFS-200/826.
The tests should pass, but some of the sync-oriented tests were either
crippled (by closing the file) or disabled (TestHLog#testSync for
example).
Enjoy :-)
-ryan
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Dhruba Borthakur <dh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1.
>
> dhruba
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As one of the main drivers behind it, I'm majorly +1. I think we can
>> get durability out of HDFS-200 (and a few other patches) and stay on a
>> fully released, tested, and (most importantly) trusted Hadoop release.
>> Distributed filesystems are hard, and there is a reason there are
>> very few actually in real production use out there. Staying on a
>> known good release is the way to go for now I think.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Jonathan Gray <jg...@facebook.com> wrote:
>> > +1 from me and from FB.
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Cosmin Lehene [mailto:clehene@adobe.com]
>> >> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:14 PM
>> >> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org; apurtell@apache.org
>> >> Subject: Re: [MORE DISCUSSION] Moving hbase trunk (temporarily) back to
>> >> hadoop 0.20.x (from head of the hadoop 0.21 branch)
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> It's the best option in order to be able to release hbase-0.21.
>> >>
>> >> We're already running on hdfs-0.21 and mapreduce-0.21 so if there won't
>> >> be any real blocking issues we're going to stick with 0.21.
>> >>
>> >> HBASE-2233 is appealing so we're for it unless it would take too much
>> >> work, which doesn't seem to be the case.
>> >>
>> >> Cosmin
>> >>
>> >> On Mar 18, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > +1
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks, this means I can get off of branch for dev and move back to
>> >> trunk.
>> >> >
>> >> > - Andy
>> >> >
>> >> >> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
>> >> >> Subject: [MORE DISCUSSION] Moving hbase trunk (temporarily) back to
>> >> hadoop 0.20.x (from head of the hadoop 0.21 branch)
>> >> >> To: "HBase Dev List" <hb...@hadoop.apache.org>
>> >> >> Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 11:28 AM
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Unless there is objection, in the next day or so, I'd like
>> >> >> to revert the hadoop that is in hbase trunk and replace it
>> >> >> with hadoop 0.20.2.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
>
Re: [MORE DISCUSSION] Moving hbase trunk (temporarily) back to hadoop
0.20.x (from head of the hadoop 0.21 branch)
Posted by Dhruba Borthakur <dh...@gmail.com>.
+1.
dhruba
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As one of the main drivers behind it, I'm majorly +1. I think we can
> get durability out of HDFS-200 (and a few other patches) and stay on a
> fully released, tested, and (most importantly) trusted Hadoop release.
> Distributed filesystems are hard, and there is a reason there are
> very few actually in real production use out there. Staying on a
> known good release is the way to go for now I think.
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Jonathan Gray <jg...@facebook.com> wrote:
> > +1 from me and from FB.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Cosmin Lehene [mailto:clehene@adobe.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:14 PM
> >> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org; apurtell@apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [MORE DISCUSSION] Moving hbase trunk (temporarily) back to
> >> hadoop 0.20.x (from head of the hadoop 0.21 branch)
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> It's the best option in order to be able to release hbase-0.21.
> >>
> >> We're already running on hdfs-0.21 and mapreduce-0.21 so if there won't
> >> be any real blocking issues we're going to stick with 0.21.
> >>
> >> HBASE-2233 is appealing so we're for it unless it would take too much
> >> work, which doesn't seem to be the case.
> >>
> >> Cosmin
> >>
> >> On Mar 18, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > Thanks, this means I can get off of branch for dev and move back to
> >> trunk.
> >> >
> >> > - Andy
> >> >
> >> >> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> >> >> Subject: [MORE DISCUSSION] Moving hbase trunk (temporarily) back to
> >> hadoop 0.20.x (from head of the hadoop 0.21 branch)
> >> >> To: "HBase Dev List" <hb...@hadoop.apache.org>
> >> >> Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 11:28 AM
> >> >>
> >> >> Unless there is objection, in the next day or so, I'd like
> >> >> to revert the hadoop that is in hbase trunk and replace it
> >> >> with hadoop 0.20.2.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
>
--
Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
Re: [MORE DISCUSSION] Moving hbase trunk (temporarily) back to hadoop
0.20.x (from head of the hadoop 0.21 branch)
Posted by Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com>.
As one of the main drivers behind it, I'm majorly +1. I think we can
get durability out of HDFS-200 (and a few other patches) and stay on a
fully released, tested, and (most importantly) trusted Hadoop release.
Distributed filesystems are hard, and there is a reason there are
very few actually in real production use out there. Staying on a
known good release is the way to go for now I think.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Jonathan Gray <jg...@facebook.com> wrote:
> +1 from me and from FB.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Cosmin Lehene [mailto:clehene@adobe.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:14 PM
>> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org; apurtell@apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [MORE DISCUSSION] Moving hbase trunk (temporarily) back to
>> hadoop 0.20.x (from head of the hadoop 0.21 branch)
>>
>> +1
>>
>> It's the best option in order to be able to release hbase-0.21.
>>
>> We're already running on hdfs-0.21 and mapreduce-0.21 so if there won't
>> be any real blocking issues we're going to stick with 0.21.
>>
>> HBASE-2233 is appealing so we're for it unless it would take too much
>> work, which doesn't seem to be the case.
>>
>> Cosmin
>>
>> On Mar 18, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > Thanks, this means I can get off of branch for dev and move back to
>> trunk.
>> >
>> > - Andy
>> >
>> >> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
>> >> Subject: [MORE DISCUSSION] Moving hbase trunk (temporarily) back to
>> hadoop 0.20.x (from head of the hadoop 0.21 branch)
>> >> To: "HBase Dev List" <hb...@hadoop.apache.org>
>> >> Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 11:28 AM
>> >>
>> >> Unless there is objection, in the next day or so, I'd like
>> >> to revert the hadoop that is in hbase trunk and replace it
>> >> with hadoop 0.20.2.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
RE: [MORE DISCUSSION] Moving hbase trunk (temporarily) back to
hadoop 0.20.x (from head of the hadoop 0.21 branch)
Posted by Jonathan Gray <jg...@facebook.com>.
+1 from me and from FB.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cosmin Lehene [mailto:clehene@adobe.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:14 PM
> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org; apurtell@apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MORE DISCUSSION] Moving hbase trunk (temporarily) back to
> hadoop 0.20.x (from head of the hadoop 0.21 branch)
>
> +1
>
> It's the best option in order to be able to release hbase-0.21.
>
> We're already running on hdfs-0.21 and mapreduce-0.21 so if there won't
> be any real blocking issues we're going to stick with 0.21.
>
> HBASE-2233 is appealing so we're for it unless it would take too much
> work, which doesn't seem to be the case.
>
> Cosmin
>
> On Mar 18, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks, this means I can get off of branch for dev and move back to
> trunk.
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> >> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> >> Subject: [MORE DISCUSSION] Moving hbase trunk (temporarily) back to
> hadoop 0.20.x (from head of the hadoop 0.21 branch)
> >> To: "HBase Dev List" <hb...@hadoop.apache.org>
> >> Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 11:28 AM
> >>
> >> Unless there is objection, in the next day or so, I'd like
> >> to revert the hadoop that is in hbase trunk and replace it
> >> with hadoop 0.20.2.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Re: [MORE DISCUSSION] Moving hbase trunk (temporarily) back to
hadoop 0.20.x (from head of the hadoop 0.21 branch)
Posted by Cosmin Lehene <cl...@adobe.com>.
+1
It's the best option in order to be able to release hbase-0.21.
We're already running on hdfs-0.21 and mapreduce-0.21 so if there won't be any real blocking issues we're going to stick with 0.21.
HBASE-2233 is appealing so we're for it unless it would take too much work, which doesn't seem to be the case.
Cosmin
On Mar 18, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks, this means I can get off of branch for dev and move back to trunk.
>
> - Andy
>
>> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
>> Subject: [MORE DISCUSSION] Moving hbase trunk (temporarily) back to hadoop 0.20.x (from head of the hadoop 0.21 branch)
>> To: "HBase Dev List" <hb...@hadoop.apache.org>
>> Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 11:28 AM
>>
>> Unless there is objection, in the next day or so, I'd like
>> to revert the hadoop that is in hbase trunk and replace it
>> with hadoop 0.20.2.
>
>
>
>
>
>