You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Mohit Anchlia <mo...@gmail.com> on 2012/11/10 20:54:50 UTC
Invlaid client id exception
Does anyone know why one would get this error?
javax.jms.InvalidClientIDException: Broker: pprddaamq304.ie.i.net - Client:
NC_pprddaamq300.ie.i.net_outbound already connected from vm://
pprddaamq304.ie.i.net#0
Re: Invlaid client id exception
Posted by Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com>.
yes, you need to have separate <networConnector ...> for each or the
urls in the static list from before, and provide each with a unique
name
On 14 November 2012 15:51, Mohit Anchlia <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> that is really a bug with static:
>>
>> it replicates the network connector config for each url in the list,
>> so they all have the same name. For duplex this is a problem.
>>
>> To use multiple connectors with duplex to the same host, they need to
>> have unique names so you will need to use boiler plate xml config for
>> each url with a different name value.
>>
>> Thanks I'll write a bug. In your suggestion you mean just add a name
> attribute to networkConnectors with each host having a different name?
>
> The static: discovery url handler should really auto increment a
>> default name for you in this case. Can you raise an enhancement jira
>> for that.
>>
>> On 11 November 2012 16:33, Mohit Anchlia <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I had to remove duplex from network of connectors. Does it mean I can't
>> use
>> > duplex?
>> >
>> > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanchlia@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Does anyone know why one would get this error?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> javax.jms.InvalidClientIDException: Broker: pprddaamq304.ie.i.net -
>> >> Client: NC_pprddaamq300.ie.i.net_outbound already connected from vm://
>> >> pprddaamq304.ie.i.net#0 <http://pprddaamq304.ie.i.net/#0> <
>> http://pprddaamq304.ie.i.net/#0>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://redhat.com
>> http://blog.garytully.com
>>
--
http://redhat.com
http://blog.garytully.com
Re: Invlaid client id exception
Posted by Mohit Anchlia <mo...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> that is really a bug with static:
>
> it replicates the network connector config for each url in the list,
> so they all have the same name. For duplex this is a problem.
>
> To use multiple connectors with duplex to the same host, they need to
> have unique names so you will need to use boiler plate xml config for
> each url with a different name value.
>
> Thanks I'll write a bug. In your suggestion you mean just add a name
attribute to networkConnectors with each host having a different name?
The static: discovery url handler should really auto increment a
> default name for you in this case. Can you raise an enhancement jira
> for that.
>
> On 11 November 2012 16:33, Mohit Anchlia <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I had to remove duplex from network of connectors. Does it mean I can't
> use
> > duplex?
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanchlia@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Does anyone know why one would get this error?
> >>
> >>
> >> javax.jms.InvalidClientIDException: Broker: pprddaamq304.ie.i.net -
> >> Client: NC_pprddaamq300.ie.i.net_outbound already connected from vm://
> >> pprddaamq304.ie.i.net#0 <http://pprddaamq304.ie.i.net/#0> <
> http://pprddaamq304.ie.i.net/#0>
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> http://redhat.com
> http://blog.garytully.com
>
Re: Invlaid client id exception
Posted by Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com>.
that is really a bug with static:
it replicates the network connector config for each url in the list,
so they all have the same name. For duplex this is a problem.
To use multiple connectors with duplex to the same host, they need to
have unique names so you will need to use boiler plate xml config for
each url with a different name value.
The static: discovery url handler should really auto increment a
default name for you in this case. Can you raise an enhancement jira
for that.
On 11 November 2012 16:33, Mohit Anchlia <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I had to remove duplex from network of connectors. Does it mean I can't use
> duplex?
>
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mohit Anchlia <mo...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know why one would get this error?
>>
>>
>> javax.jms.InvalidClientIDException: Broker: pprddaamq304.ie.i.net -
>> Client: NC_pprddaamq300.ie.i.net_outbound already connected from vm://
>> pprddaamq304.ie.i.net#0 <http://pprddaamq304.ie.i.net/#0>
>>
--
http://redhat.com
http://blog.garytully.com
Re: Invlaid client id exception
Posted by Torsten Mielke <to...@fusesource.com>.
On Nov 12, 2012, at 6:00 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> It looks something like
> "static(tcp://host1:61616,tcp://host2:61616,tcp://host3:61616)" On all the
> hosts it's the same config. The problem either I can keep duplex or not
> since I am using multiple hosts.
If all your brokers use a network connector similar to the above, then you really don't need duplex=true.
duplex=true is rather for broker topologies where you can create the network bridge only on one of the two broker instances. It then allows messages to flow in both directions even though the bridge got created on only one broker.
Nevertheless it should generally be okay to create duplex network connectors on all broker instances. This should not result in errors.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
torsten@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Torsten Mielke <to...@fusesource.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello Mohit,
>>
>> How does your network connector configuration look like?
>> In general you can use duplex=true.
>> There is generally no need to define a network connector with duplex=true
>> on both broker ends. With duplex=true one network connector definition
>> between the two brokers is enough.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Torsten Mielke
>> torsten@fusesource.com
>> tmielke.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>> On Nov 11, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>>
>>> I had to remove duplex from network of connectors. Does it mean I can't
>> use
>>> duplex?
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanchlia@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does anyone know why one would get this error?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> javax.jms.InvalidClientIDException: Broker: pprddaamq304.ie.i.net -
>>>> Client: NC_pprddaamq300.ie.i.net_outbound already connected from vm://
>>>> pprddaamq304.ie.i.net#0 <http://pprddaamq304.ie.i.net/#0> <
>> http://pprddaamq304.ie.i.net/#0>
Re: Invlaid client id exception
Posted by Christian Posta <ch...@gmail.com>.
If you post your <networkConnector> config we can tell more, but I suspect
you're naming the connectors the same name on all machines in
<networkConnect name="<here>".
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Mohit Anchlia <mo...@gmail.com>wrote:
> It looks something like
> "static(tcp://host1:61616,tcp://host2:61616,tcp://host3:61616)" On all the
> hosts it's the same config. The problem either I can keep duplex or not
> since I am using multiple hosts.
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Torsten Mielke <torsten@fusesource.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hello Mohit,
> >
> > How does your network connector configuration look like?
> > In general you can use duplex=true.
> > There is generally no need to define a network connector with duplex=true
> > on both broker ends. With duplex=true one network connector definition
> > between the two brokers is enough.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Torsten Mielke
> > torsten@fusesource.com
> > tmielke.blogspot.com
> >
> >
> > On Nov 11, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> >
> > > I had to remove duplex from network of connectors. Does it mean I can't
> > use
> > > duplex?
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mohit Anchlia <
> mohitanchlia@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Does anyone know why one would get this error?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> javax.jms.InvalidClientIDException: Broker: pprddaamq304.ie.i.net -
> > >> Client: NC_pprddaamq300.ie.i.net_outbound already connected from vm://
> > >> pprddaamq304.ie.i.net#0 <http://pprddaamq304.ie.i.net/#0> <
> > http://pprddaamq304.ie.i.net/#0>
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta
Re: Invlaid client id exception
Posted by Mohit Anchlia <mo...@gmail.com>.
It looks something like
"static(tcp://host1:61616,tcp://host2:61616,tcp://host3:61616)" On all the
hosts it's the same config. The problem either I can keep duplex or not
since I am using multiple hosts.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Torsten Mielke <to...@fusesource.com>wrote:
> Hello Mohit,
>
> How does your network connector configuration look like?
> In general you can use duplex=true.
> There is generally no need to define a network connector with duplex=true
> on both broker ends. With duplex=true one network connector definition
> between the two brokers is enough.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Torsten Mielke
> torsten@fusesource.com
> tmielke.blogspot.com
>
>
> On Nov 11, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>
> > I had to remove duplex from network of connectors. Does it mean I can't
> use
> > duplex?
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanchlia@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Does anyone know why one would get this error?
> >>
> >>
> >> javax.jms.InvalidClientIDException: Broker: pprddaamq304.ie.i.net -
> >> Client: NC_pprddaamq300.ie.i.net_outbound already connected from vm://
> >> pprddaamq304.ie.i.net#0 <http://pprddaamq304.ie.i.net/#0> <
> http://pprddaamq304.ie.i.net/#0>
> >>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Invlaid client id exception
Posted by Torsten Mielke <to...@fusesource.com>.
Hello Mohit,
How does your network connector configuration look like?
In general you can use duplex=true.
There is generally no need to define a network connector with duplex=true on both broker ends. With duplex=true one network connector definition between the two brokers is enough.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
torsten@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 11, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> I had to remove duplex from network of connectors. Does it mean I can't use
> duplex?
>
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mohit Anchlia <mo...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know why one would get this error?
>>
>>
>> javax.jms.InvalidClientIDException: Broker: pprddaamq304.ie.i.net -
>> Client: NC_pprddaamq300.ie.i.net_outbound already connected from vm://
>> pprddaamq304.ie.i.net#0 <http://pprddaamq304.ie.i.net/#0>
>>
Re: Invlaid client id exception
Posted by Mohit Anchlia <mo...@gmail.com>.
I had to remove duplex from network of connectors. Does it mean I can't use
duplex?
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mohit Anchlia <mo...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Does anyone know why one would get this error?
>
>
> javax.jms.InvalidClientIDException: Broker: pprddaamq304.ie.i.net -
> Client: NC_pprddaamq300.ie.i.net_outbound already connected from vm://
> pprddaamq304.ie.i.net#0 <http://pprddaamq304.ie.i.net/#0>
>