You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@rave.apache.org by Chris Geer <ch...@cxtsoftware.com> on 2013/02/19 03:44:22 UTC
Git
Now that Apache is offering writable Git repos [1] I'd be a proponent to
migrate over. Would other people be interested in moving over? Here is the
list of project already moved over [2].
Chris
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/writable-git
[2] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf
Re: Git
Posted by Erin Noe-Payne <er...@gmail.com>.
+1 to git.
I prefer git for the ability to locally stash and branch - tends to make my
life easier.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Chris Geer <ch...@cxtsoftware.com> wrote:
> Now that Apache is offering writable Git repos [1] I'd be a proponent to
> migrate over. Would other people be interested in moving over? Here is the
> list of project already moved over [2].
>
> Chris
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/writable-git
> [2] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf
>
Re: Git
Posted by Chris Geer <ch...@cxtsoftware.com>.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal <ja...@apache.org>wrote:
> On 19 February 2013 16:59, Matt Franklin <m....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I am +1. We have the Git SVN mirror, but that tends to not work as
> > well as I would like.
> >
> > The biggest question in my mind is how we update the release process
> > but this shouldn't really be an issue.
> >
>
> From my experience a rollback isn't possible with the Maven release plugin.
> OTOH setting the same tag twice but for a different revision is not really
> clean.
> IF we move to Git, we also need to define a workflow.
>
Yes. I thought there was a way to tell the Maven release plugin to not do a
push, which means we could revert the changes manually.
>
> +0 for moving to Git.
>
>
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Chris Geer <ch...@cxtsoftware.com>
> wrote:
> > > Now that Apache is offering writable Git repos [1] I'd be a proponent
> to
> > > migrate over. Would other people be interested in moving over? Here is
> > the
> > > list of project already moved over [2].
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/writable-git
> > > [2] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf
> >
>
Re: Git
Posted by Jasha Joachimsthal <ja...@apache.org>.
On 19 February 2013 16:59, Matt Franklin <m....@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am +1. We have the Git SVN mirror, but that tends to not work as
> well as I would like.
>
> The biggest question in my mind is how we update the release process
> but this shouldn't really be an issue.
>
>From my experience a rollback isn't possible with the Maven release plugin.
OTOH setting the same tag twice but for a different revision is not really
clean.
IF we move to Git, we also need to define a workflow.
+0 for moving to Git.
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Chris Geer <ch...@cxtsoftware.com> wrote:
> > Now that Apache is offering writable Git repos [1] I'd be a proponent to
> > migrate over. Would other people be interested in moving over? Here is
> the
> > list of project already moved over [2].
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/writable-git
> > [2] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf
>
Re: Git
Posted by Matt Franklin <m....@gmail.com>.
I am +1. We have the Git SVN mirror, but that tends to not work as
well as I would like.
The biggest question in my mind is how we update the release process
but this shouldn't really be an issue.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Chris Geer <ch...@cxtsoftware.com> wrote:
> Now that Apache is offering writable Git repos [1] I'd be a proponent to
> migrate over. Would other people be interested in moving over? Here is the
> list of project already moved over [2].
>
> Chris
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/writable-git
> [2] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf