[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5210) amend example's schema.xml and solrconfig.xml for blockjoin support

["Tadas Dailyda (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14942469#comment-14942469 ] 

Tadas Dailyda commented on SOLR-5210:
-------------------------------------

I might be wrong here but to me it seems that {!child} queries don't work when _root_ field is not stored (return all indexed documents).

SVN commit which is referred to in the original description (r1513290) has _root_ field with stored="true" in schema. However r1520082 has stored="false". And this remains so in latest Solr releases.

So I am making a conclusion that distributed "solr" example actually doesn't properly work with block joins.

Or maybe I should open a new issue for this?

> amend example's schema.xml and solrconfig.xml for blockjoin support
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-5210
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5210
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Mikhail Khludnev
>            Assignee: Yonik Seeley
>             Fix For: 4.5, Trunk
>
>
> I suppose it make sense to apply https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/core/src/test-files/solr/collection1/conf/solrconfig.xml?r1=1513290&r2=1513289&pathrev=1513290 and https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/core/src/test-files/solr/collection1/conf/schema.xml?r1=1513290&r2=1513289&pathrev=1513290 to example's config too provide out-of-the-box block join experience. 
> WDYT?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org