[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (JDO-712) Require using the PMF schema definition with sequence names

["Craig L Russell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Craig L Russell updated JDO-712:
--------------------------------

    Comment: was deleted

(was: To test that the annotation is properly defined, we just need to add a test class with the annotations including the extension elements in the jdo-api test/java/javax/jdo/annotations directory.

When compiling the jdo-api project if the class compiles the annotation is correct.

Obviously, there cannot be a test for semantics.)

> Require using the PMF schema definition with sequence names
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JDO-712
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-712
>             Project: JDO
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: specification, tck
>    Affects Versions: JDO 3 (3.0)
>            Reporter: Michael Bouschen
>             Fix For: JDO 3 maintenance release 2 (3.2)
>
>
> Chapter 18 XML Metadata of the spec defines that a schema declared at the jdo, orm, package, class or interface level, specifies the schema to be used as the default for tables contained therein. And if not specified the schema defaults to the PMF schema property (see end of page 221 and beginning of page 222 of the JDO 3.0 spec).
> The spec should define the same default for sequences. Then JDO implementation would take the PMF schema definition to prefix the sequence name the same way it currently does for all the table names. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)