You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Justin Mclean <jm...@apache.org> on 2014/02/18 21:47:20 UTC
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Hi,
> [java] gumbo/FCK/integration/FCK_Integration_main FCK_integration_skin_up Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 1) compare returned[object BitmapData]
> [java] gumbo/FCK/integration/FCK_Integration_main FCK_integration_skin_over Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 4) compare returned[object BitmapData]
> [java] gumbo/FCK/integration/FCK_Integration_main FCK_integration_skin_down Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 5) compare returned[object BitmapData]
Pass here on OSX / FP 11.1.
> [java] gumbo/components/Border/Properties/Border_Properties Border_Properties_borderStroke_RGS4 Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 2) compare returned[object BitmapData]
Also passes.
> [java] gumbo/components/Image/styles/Image_styles_smoothingQuality Image_Scale_stretch_smoothingQuality_high Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 6) compare returned[object BitmapData]
And does this - although I notice the last test does have broken images in it.
Reran the tests on FP 12.0 and they also all passed - so I'm guessing this is just an aberration/false positive?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> As to the failure, experience teaches that if it hasn't occurred in two
> consecutive runs, it didn't officially happen ;-)
It did occur two runs in a row. :-(
Justin
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
I've just rebooted the VM, one of the jobs got hung up.
As to the failure, experience teaches that if it hasn't occurred in two
consecutive runs, it didn't officially happen ;-)
Patience, grasshopper.
EdB
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>wrote:
> Bump - anyone help out her?
>
> On 19 Feb 2014, at 9:49 am, Justin Mclean <jm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Could be windows only.
> >
> > Someone mind running them on windows for me?
> >
> > ./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/components/Border
> > ./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/components/Image
> > ./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/FCK/integration
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> The log says that the failure was with FP 11.7. Did you try with that
> version on your machine?
I tried 11.1 and 12.0, can try with 11.7.
Justin
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
I suggest revisiting that change to see if you can see why the size is a bit different. Horizontal thumb was 18 width instead of expected 15.
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
Hi,
> I grabbed the bad.png.* files after the last failure run. I just took a
> look and of the two I looked at (Border and one of the FCK) both are
> showing slightly different scrollbar thumb sizes
Any idea why they might be different here and not in the 1000's of other tests? How different are we talking?
> For the sake of the tests, it might be better if the change made sure the
> thumb size is set to something so we can get consistent results.
So your suggesting that the SDK code should set the scrollbar size?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> I grabbed the bad.png.* files after the last failure run. I just took a
> look and of the two I looked at (Border and one of the FCK) both are
> showing slightly different scrollbar thumb sizes
Any idea why they might be different here and not in the 1000's of other tests? How different are we talking?
> For the sake of the tests, it might be better if the change made sure the
> thumb size is set to something so we can get consistent results.
So your suggesting that the SDK code should set the scrollbar size?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
I grabbed the bad.png.* files after the last failure run. I just took a
look and of the two I looked at (Border and one of the FCK) both are
showing slightly different scrollbar thumb sizes, so I would suspect the
change cf660e8408c0c4d7219889ea66ed6df4bcc12f71
For the sake of the tests, it might be better if the change made sure the
thumb size is set to something so we can get consistent results.
-Alex
On 2/19/14 5:38 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Thanks, any chance you could look at the bitmaps and see what the
>issue(s) actually is?
>
>Justin
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
Thanks, any chance you could look at the bitmaps and see what the issue(s) actually is?
Justin
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
I redid my tests, ignore my prior email (my workspace was a bit messed up
last night)
Here are the results on a Windows 7, 64-bit machine:
*Tests: ./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/components/Border*
*With FP 11.1:*
1 Failure (even after running -failures):
[java] gumbo/components/Border/Properties/Border_Properties
Border_Properties_borderStroke_RGS4 Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 2)
compare returned[object BitmapData]
*With FP 11.7:*
1 Failure (even after running -failures):
[java] gumbo/components/Border/Properties/Border_Properties
Border_Properties_borderStroke_RGS4 Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 2)
compare returned[object BitmapData]
*Tests: ./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/components/Image*
*With FP 11.1:*
All pass
*With FP 11.7:*
1 Failure (even after running -failures):
[java] gumbo/components/Image/styles/Image_styles_smoothingQuality
Image_Scale_stretch_smoothingQuality_high Failed CompareBitmap(body:step
6) compare returned[object BitmapData]
*Tests: ./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/FCK/integration*
*With FP 11.1:*
3 Failures (even after running -failures)
[java] gumbo/FCK/integration/FCK_Integration_main
FCK_integration_skin_up Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 1) compare
returned[object BitmapData]
[java] gumbo/FCK/integration/FCK_Integration_main
FCK_integration_skin_over Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 4) compare
returned[object BitmapData]
[java] gumbo/FCK/integration/FCK_Integration_main
FCK_integration_skin_down Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 5) compare
returned[object BitmapData]
*With FP 11.7:*
3 Failures (even after running -failures)
[java] gumbo/FCK/integration/FCK_Integration_main
FCK_integration_skin_up Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 1) compare
returned[object BitmapData]
[java] gumbo/FCK/integration/FCK_Integration_main
FCK_integration_skin_over Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 4) compare
returned[object BitmapData]
[java] gumbo/FCK/integration/FCK_Integration_main
FCK_integration_skin_down Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 5) compare
returned[object BitmapData]
The results seem to match what the Mustella VM is reporting as well. It
does look like a real problem.
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> Hey, you're still around. Sorry for speaking before my turn ;-)
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:41 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> <bi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Yup Windows.
> >
> > Om
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yes: I believe Om is on Windows.
> > >
> > > EdB
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Justin Mclean <
> justin@classsoftware.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > > My tests seem to run fine but with 11.1.
> > > > On windows?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Justin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ix Multimedia Software
> > >
> > > Jan Luykenstraat 27
> > > 3521 VB Utrecht
> > >
> > > T. 06-51952295
> > > I. www.ixsoftware.nl
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
Hey, you're still around. Sorry for speaking before my turn ;-)
EdB
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:41 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
<bi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Yup Windows.
>
> Om
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes: I believe Om is on Windows.
> >
> > EdB
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > My tests seem to run fine but with 11.1.
> > > On windows?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ix Multimedia Software
> >
> > Jan Luykenstraat 27
> > 3521 VB Utrecht
> >
> > T. 06-51952295
> > I. www.ixsoftware.nl
> >
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
Yup Windows.
Om
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> Yes: I believe Om is on Windows.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > My tests seem to run fine but with 11.1.
> > On windows?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
Yes: I believe Om is on Windows.
EdB
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > My tests seem to run fine but with 11.1.
> On windows?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> My tests seem to run fine but with 11.1.
On windows?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
My tests seem to run fine but with 11.1.
I will download 11.7 and test again in the morning (around 10 hours from
now)
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The log says that the failure was with FP 11.7. Did you try with that
> > version on your machine?
>
> Also fine on OSX on 11.7 here all 3 tests run with no failures.
>
> Justin
>
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> The log says that the failure was with FP 11.7. Did you try with that
> version on your machine?
Also fine on OSX on 11.7 here all 3 tests run with no failures.
Justin
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 18, 2014 11:20 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> Bump - anyone help out her?
Will do my best to run it tonight.
The log says that the failure was with FP 11.7. Did you try with that
version on your machine?
>
> On 19 Feb 2014, at 9:49 am, Justin Mclean <jm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Could be windows only.
> >
> > Someone mind running them on windows for me?
> >
> > ./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/components/Border
> > ./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/components/Image
> > ./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/FCK/integration
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
>
RE: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
I'm on the road this week and don't have my Windows computer with me.
-Alex
________________________________________
From: Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 11:19 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Bump - anyone help out her?
On 19 Feb 2014, at 9:49 am, Justin Mclean <jm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Could be windows only.
>
> Someone mind running them on windows for me?
>
> ./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/components/Border
> ./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/components/Image
> ./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/FCK/integration
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Bump - anyone help out her?
On 19 Feb 2014, at 9:49 am, Justin Mclean <jm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Could be windows only.
>
> Someone mind running them on windows for me?
>
> ./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/components/Border
> ./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/components/Image
> ./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/FCK/integration
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure!
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Could be windows only.
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Justin Mclean <jm...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,
> [java] gumbo/FCK/integration/FCK_Integration_main FCK_integration_skin_up Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 1) compare returned[object BitmapData]
> [java] gumbo/FCK/integration/FCK_Integration_main FCK_integration_skin_over Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 4) compare returned[object BitmapData]
> [java] gumbo/FCK/integration/FCK_Integration_main FCK_integration_skin_down Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 5) compare returned[object BitmapData]
Pass here on OSX / FP 11.1.
> [java] gumbo/components/Border/Properties/Border_Properties Border_Properties_borderStroke_RGS4 Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 2) compare returned[object BitmapData]
Also passes.
> [java] gumbo/components/Image/styles/Image_styles_smoothingQuality Image_Scale_stretch_smoothingQuality_high Failed CompareBitmap(body:step 6) compare returned[object BitmapData]
And does this - although I notice the last test does have broken images in it.
Reran the tests on FP 12.0 and they also all passed - so I'm guessing this is just an aberration/false positive?
Thanks,
Justin