You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> on 2014/04/22 08:26:03 UTC

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.1 RC4

Vote passes with 3 +1 votes, no 0 votes and no -1 votes.

On 4/21/14 10:33 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:

>+1 (binding)
>
>Sigs ok
>Builds ok.
>Can be used in FlexJS builds
>
>Definitely agree this is the bare minimum to go public with.  Still lots
>of work to get to 1.0.
>
>-Alex
>
>On 4/20/14 10:45 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
>>+1 (binding)
>>
>>- sigs good
>>- docs meager, but seem OK
>>- 'ant all' target completes successfully (i.e. source builds and all
>>tests
>>pass)
>>
>>I'll go with Justin on this one and add that these aren't release quality
>>bits, but I think it is a good move to release early and (hopefully)
>>often,
>>getting this new framework to where the wild things live ;-)
>>
>>EdB
>>
>>
>>
>>On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Justin Mclean
>><ju...@classsoftware.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> NOTICE, LICENCE, RELEASE_NOTE all OK (minor formatting/line length
>>>issues)
>>> checksum/sigs good
>>> rat report good
>>> can compile from source
>>> unit tests pass
>>> can use mxmlc and compc without error however can't use compiler.jx
>>>compc
>>> and mxmlc
>>> was (eventually) able to test compiler.jx with upstream FlexJS  package
>>>
>>> Note if this wasn't an alpha I wouldn't vote +1
>>> - documentation needs some work
>>> - compiler.jx compc and mxmlc don't work out of the box
>>> - relies on a upstream package to correctly test and not all
>>> tests/examples are working
>>>
>>> Tested on OSX.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Justin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-- 
>>Ix Multimedia Software
>>
>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>3521 VB Utrecht
>>
>>T. 06-51952295
>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>