[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Cocoon 3.0.0-alpha-3

[Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>]

Hi all,
the Apache Cocoon 3.0.0-alpha-3 vote passed with four +1, no +/-0, no
-1. Votes have been expressed by following people:

Simone Tripodi *
Franchesco Chicchiriccò *
Reinhard Poetz *
David Crossley *

no other votes have been expressed.
Thanks everybody who took part to the review, I'll proceed now to the
second part of the release.
Have a nice day, all the best!
Simo

(*) binding vote

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Simone Tripodi
<si...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi David,
> OK, thanks! Anyway I re-uploaded the md5/sha1 files without the -n prefix :P
> Thanks once again,
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:56 AM, David Crossley <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> Hi David!!!
>>> thanks a lot for your review, I'll work on the problems you notified
>>> before declaring the vote passed!
>>
>> Well it does not need to be done at this stage if
>> it receives sufficient votes.
>>
>> In my opinion these issue can wait until the next
>> release cycle.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>> David Crossley wrote:
>>> > Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> >> Hi again,
>>> >> just to make sure everybody tests the same stuff, please refer to:
>>> >>
>>> >> http://people.apache.org/builds/cocoon/org/apache/cocoon/all/cocoon-all/3.0.0-alpha-3/cocoon-all-3.0.0-alpha-3-dist.tar.gz*
>>> >> http://people.apache.org/builds/cocoon/org/apache/cocoon/all/cocoon-all/3.0.0-alpha-3/cocoon-all-3.0.0-alpha-3-dist.zip*
>>> >>
>>> >> Include GPG key and checksum verification!!!
>>> >
>>> > Thanks Simone.
>>> >
>>> > +1 from me.
>>> >
>>> > MD5 (cocoon-all-3.0.0-alpha-3-dist.tar.gz) = 5b2e839101ec53246690b05dbf136b13
>>> >
>>> > There are a couple of things that should get fixed
>>> > for next time:
>>> >
>>> > The md5 and sha1 files have extra "-n".
>>> >
>>> > All NOTICE.txt files have a year range, so needs 2011.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I don't understand how Maven stuff works. There are some
>>> > declared dependencies. They do use suitable licenses.
>>> > Do we need to add a copy of their licenses in our distribution?
>>> >
>>> > e.g. some are:
>>> > AspectJ : EPL-1.0
>>> > Woodstox : Apache License 2.0
>>> > Antlr : BSD
>>> > MurmurHash : Apache License 2.0
>>> >
>>> > Some of those licenses do require reciprocity:
>>> > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
>>> > e.g.
>>> > We already have mentioned in NOTICE.txt the JAXB using CDDL.
>>> >
>>> > However we have not mentioned AspectJ using EPL.
>>> >
>>> > We do mention Java MurmurHash using AL-20 and the original
>>> > using MIT, but we do not need to.
>>> >
>>> > -David
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>