You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@xalan.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2001/08/01 16:42:20 UTC
[Bug 2931] - xsltc fails conf test numbering66 et al
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2931
*** shadow/2931 Tue Jul 31 11:55:55 2001
--- shadow/2931.tmp.22426 Wed Aug 1 07:42:20 2001
***************
*** 1,5 ****
+============================================================================+
! | xsltc fails conf test numbering66 |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bug #: 2931 Product: XalanJ2 |
| Status: NEW Version: 2.0.0 |
--- 1,5 ----
+============================================================================+
! | xsltc fails conf test numbering66 et al |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bug #: 2931 Product: XalanJ2 |
| Status: NEW Version: 2.0.0 |
***************
*** 300,302 ****
--- 300,312 ----
</section>
</chapter>
</doc>
+
+ ------- Additional Comments From tamiro@east.sun.com 2001-08-01 07:42 -------
+ Not sure if all these tests have a common root cause, but I wanted to call these
+ fails out somewhere. So this bug is now the omnibus bug for all the numbering
+ problems not specifically addressed in other bugs.
+
+ xsltc is failing the following numbering conf test in nontrivial ways:
+
+ numbering28, numbering37, numbering42, numbering48, numbering50, numbering58,
+ numbering63, numbering71, numbering78
\ No newline at end of file