You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@pulsar.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2019/01/04 22:31:06 UTC

[GitHub] rdhabalia commented on a change in pull request #3240: timeout stuck producer/consumer operation request

rdhabalia commented on a change in pull request #3240: timeout stuck producer/consumer operation request
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/3240#discussion_r245438615
 
 

 ##########
 File path: pulsar-client/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/impl/ClientCnx.java
 ##########
 @@ -668,6 +668,15 @@ SocketAddress serverAddrees() {
                 future.completeExceptionally(writeFuture.cause());
             }
         });
+        eventLoopGroup.schedule(() -> {
 
 Review comment:
   > this would be scheduled per request. so it would end up with a lot of timeout tasks, 
   
   in ideal scenario, application will have max few hundred producers/consumers and in worst case, 1 timeout task per producer/consumer so, it should not have large number of pending tasks. So, not sure if that will be create any performance impact.
   
   > there is no mechanism to cancel the timeout tasks. so all tasks will be remaining until they are timed out. Can we change the approach to have one timer task that peridocally check the pending requests list?
   
   umm.. that makes sense. Let me fix it.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services