You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by de...@apache.org on 2003/04/12 02:12:16 UTC
cvs commit: xml-batik/sources/org/apache/batik/css/engine CSSEngine.java
deweese 2003/04/11 17:12:16
Modified: sources/org/apache/batik/css/engine CSSEngine.java
Log:
1) Batik no longer considers all @font-face rules a syntax error.
But Batik still just ignores them.
Revision Changes Path
1.20 +9 -1 xml-batik/sources/org/apache/batik/css/engine/CSSEngine.java
Index: CSSEngine.java
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-batik/sources/org/apache/batik/css/engine/CSSEngine.java,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -r1.19 -r1.20
--- CSSEngine.java 11 Apr 2003 13:55:27 -0000 1.19
+++ CSSEngine.java 12 Apr 2003 00:12:16 -0000 1.20
@@ -1375,6 +1375,7 @@
* org.w3c.css.sac.DocumentHandler#startFontFace()}.
*/
public void startFontFace() throws CSSException {
+ styleDeclaration = new StyleDeclaration();
}
/**
@@ -1382,6 +1383,13 @@
* org.w3c.css.sac.DocumentHandler#endFontFace()}.
*/
public void endFontFace() throws CSSException {
+ // We should really register this fontFace Defn with the
+ // BridgeContext fontFamilyMap, so if someone tries to
+ // resolve this font we can look at the associated uri.
+ // We know that if it has a fragment identifier then it
+ // must be an SVG font otherwise it may be a stream
+ // worth passing to Font.createFont(int type, InputStream);
+ styleDeclaration = null;
}
/**
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xml.apache.org