You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2009/09/03 01:22:29 UTC
Was going to roll RC3 this evening unless objection?
I need to talk to Ryan to make sure he's good w/ hbase-1790 otherwise, any
reason why we shouldn't cut an RC3 this evening?
Thanks,
St.Ack
Re: Was going to roll RC3 this evening unless objection?
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Hudson is still complaining but all tests pass for me locally.
- Andy
________________________________
From: stack <st...@duboce.net>
To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2009 10:05:40 PM
Subject: Re: Was going to roll RC3 this evening unless objection?
Looks like Andrew fixed it... going ahead w/ the RC3 roll.
St.Ack
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
> Scratch that, 1715 broke the build. The failing test is also failing
> on my machine.
>
> J-D
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans<jd...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > J-D
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:22 PM, stack<st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >> I need to talk to Ryan to make sure he's good w/ hbase-1790 otherwise,
> any
> >> reason why we shouldn't cut an RC3 this evening?
> >> Thanks,
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >
>
Re: Was going to roll RC3 this evening unless objection?
Posted by stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Looks like Andrew fixed it... going ahead w/ the RC3 roll.
St.Ack
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
> Scratch that, 1715 broke the build. The failing test is also failing
> on my machine.
>
> J-D
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans<jd...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > J-D
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:22 PM, stack<st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >> I need to talk to Ryan to make sure he's good w/ hbase-1790 otherwise,
> any
> >> reason why we shouldn't cut an RC3 this evening?
> >> Thanks,
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >
>
Re: Was going to roll RC3 this evening unless objection?
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
Scratch that, 1715 broke the build. The failing test is also failing
on my machine.
J-D
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans<jd...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> J-D
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:22 PM, stack<st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> I need to talk to Ryan to make sure he's good w/ hbase-1790 otherwise, any
>> reason why we shouldn't cut an RC3 this evening?
>> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
>>
>
Re: Was going to roll RC3 this evening unless objection?
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
+1
J-D
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:22 PM, stack<st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> I need to talk to Ryan to make sure he's good w/ hbase-1790 otherwise, any
> reason why we shouldn't cut an RC3 this evening?
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
Re: Was going to roll RC3 this evening unless objection?
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
+1
________________________________
From: stack <st...@duboce.net>
To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2009 4:22:29 PM
Subject: Was going to roll RC3 this evening unless objection?
I need to talk to Ryan to make sure he's good w/ hbase-1790 otherwise, any
reason why we shouldn't cut an RC3 this evening?
Thanks,
St.Ack