Fwd: Re: [apache/bigtop] WIP flink hacking --rpm build complete (#93)

[Cos <co...@apache.org>]

That's another reason I don't like GH integration - this stuff doesn't go to
dev@ list which, at least for me, creates a lot of complications when I need
to re-trace anything ;(

What about .deb? Does it work?

Cos

Re: Re: [apache/bigtop] WIP flink hacking --rpm build complete (#93)

[Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>]

Well, I guess you're right - the messy headers threw me off. Definetely, the
emails are coming where they should. Please disregard this thread. 

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:40PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Cos <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > That's another reason I don't like GH integration - this stuff doesn't go to
> > dev@ list
> 
> Actually, at least for me -- I think it does. That's kind of the point of GH
> integration -- all communications on PRs get routed back to dev@$project
> 
> Thanks,
> Roman.

Re: Re: [apache/bigtop] WIP flink hacking --rpm build complete (#93)

[Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>]

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Cos <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> That's another reason I don't like GH integration - this stuff doesn't go to
> dev@ list

Actually, at least for me -- I think it does. That's kind of the point of GH
integration -- all communications on PRs get routed back to dev@$project

Thanks,
Roman.