[jira] Commented: (SCXML-88) SCXMLSerializer does not serialize custom namespace declarations

["Ingmar Kliche (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCXML-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646500#action_12646500 ] 

Ingmar Kliche commented on SCXML-88:
------------------------------------

And why not retaining namespace prefixes for all elements? This shouldn't be too much overhead.

> SCXMLSerializer does not serialize custom namespace declarations
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SCXML-88
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCXML-88
>             Project: Commons SCXML
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.8
>            Reporter: Ingmar Kliche
>             Fix For: 0.9
>
>         Attachments: NamespacesInTransition_testcase.patch
>
>
> The SCXMLSerializer writes the scxml namespace as the default namespace to the <scxml> root tag and adds a "cs" ("commons-scxml") namespace by default.
> But it does not take into account that the original scxml document might contain other namespace declarations, e.g. on child tags:
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <scxml xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/07/scxml" xmlns:cs="http://commons.apache.org/scxml" version="1.0" initial="S1">
>  <state id="S1">
>   <!-- some E4X like condition using XML namespaces -->
>   <!-- redefine default namespace to "foo" and use explicit namespace prefix for scxml:transition tag -->
>   <scxml:transition event="foo" cond="a.b.bar::c.* == 3" target="S2" xmlns="foo" xmlns:scxml="http://www.w3.org/2005/07/scxml" xmlns:bar="bar">
>   </transition>
>  </state>
>  <state id="S2" final="true">
>  </state>
> </scxml>
> The above SCXML document is parsed properly and namespaces are forwarded to the executor (i.e. it works correct).  But if it comes to serialization the namespaces are not serialized properly.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.