You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by "Jordan Zimmerman (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/01/22 20:37:59 UTC

[jira] Commented: (SHINDIG-883) The SecurityToken class has a getAppUrl() method. HttpGadgetContext should use it

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12666266#action_12666266 ] 

Jordan Zimmerman commented on SHINDIG-883:
------------------------------------------

Another option is to make HttpGadgetContext an interface and allow it to be injected.

> The SecurityToken class has a getAppUrl() method. HttpGadgetContext should use it
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SHINDIG-883
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-883
>             Project: Shindig
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Gadget Rendering Server (Java)
>    Affects Versions: trunk
>            Reporter: Jordan Zimmerman
>             Fix For: trunk
>
>
> Currently, HttpGadgetContext requires a parameter in the url named "url" to load the OS app. Seeing as SecurityToken has a getAppUrl() method, HttpGadgetContext should first check that. This would be far more secure. With this, I would be able to load the OS app based totally on a proprietary ID model. This would eliminate exposing implementation details to would-be hackers.
> I suggest HttpGadgetContext .getUrl() be changed to something like this:
>   public URI getUrl() {
>     if ( getToken().getAppUrl() != null ) {
>         return getToken().getAppUrl();
>     }
>     if (url == null) {
>       return super.getUrl();
>     }
>     return url;
>   }

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.