You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to j-users@xalan.apache.org by Joseph Kessselman <ke...@alum.mit.edu> on 2023/03/06 19:19:06 UTC

Eclipse environment

Trying to set up an Eclipse in the Linux VM to debug into the URI 
resolution issue. It's been a while since I've attempted to do so, and 
I'm swapping it back in from tape somewhere in Iron Mountain...  Would 
anyone happen to have a quick summary of what has to be done manually 
beyond checking out the projects, since I'm still missing a step?

I discovered that I had to provide BCEL.jar manually, since it wasn't in 
the /lib of xalan-java as checked out -- unless I checked out the wrong 
branch; reviewing that now.

Currently when I try to launch "xalan-test build.xml smoketest" within 
Eclipse, I get the complaint that JRE version less than 11 is not 
supported.  I'm guessing this means Eclipse is finding the wrong 
instance of Ant... Of course for the one test I'm concerned about I can 
try just running the test independently; lemme give that a spin.



Re: Eclipse environment

Posted by Mukul Gandhi <mu...@apache.org>.
Hi Joseph,

On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 12:49 AM Joseph Kessselman <ke...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> Trying to set up an Eclipse in the Linux VM to debug into the URI
> resolution issue. It's been a while since I've attempted to do so, and
> I'm swapping it back in from tape somewhere in Iron Mountain...  Would
> anyone happen to have a quick summary of what has to be done manually
> beyond checking out the projects, since I'm still missing a step?
>
> I discovered that I had to provide BCEL.jar manually, since it wasn't in
> the /lib of xalan-java as checked out -- unless I checked out the wrong
> branch; reviewing that now.
>
> Currently when I try to launch "xalan-test build.xml smoketest" within
> Eclipse, I get the complaint that JRE version less than 11 is not
> supported.  I'm guessing this means Eclipse is finding the wrong
> instance of Ant... Of course for the one test I'm concerned about I can
> try just running the test independently; lemme give that a spin.

Thanks, for trying to attempt to analyze and fix this issue.

Please let us know as appropriate, your findings and fixes for this.


-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi