You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net> on 2006/01/27 07:42:17 UTC
[VOTE] 1.2.3 releases
Tarballs for 1.2.3 are now available for testing in
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
+1 -1 for release:
[ ] [ ] apr-1.2.3
[ ] [ ] apr-util-1.2.3
Vote early, vote often.
-garrett
Re: [VOTE] 1.2.3 releases
Posted by Colm MacCarthaigh <co...@stdlib.net>.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 10:42:17PM -0800, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> Tarballs for 1.2.3 are now available for testing in
> http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> +1 -1 for release:
> [X] [ ] apr-1.2.3
> [X] [ ] apr-util-1.2.3
>
> Vote early, vote often.
Tested on ubuntu
--
Colm MacCárthaigh Public Key: colm+pgp@stdlib.net
Re: [VOTE] 1.2.3 releases
Posted by M Joonas Pihlaja <jp...@cc.helsinki.fi>.
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 1/29/06, M Joonas Pihlaja <jp...@cc.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> > SunOS mitzi 5.9 Generic_118558-09 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-Enterprise
> > testflock hangs the process, and after vigorous killing, the
> > process becomes a zombie.
This is possibly some kind of strange NFS locking issue. The
directory where I first tried this was NFS mounted. Running
under dbx, I can see it blocking indefinitely in fcntl():
[3] fcntl(0x3, 0x7, 0xffbff5ec, 0xff34f860, 0x0, 0xf4121), at 0xff25df28
=>[4] apr_file_lock(thefile = 0xf40d0, type = 2), line 46 in "flock.c"
[5] test_withlock(tc = 0xffbff6f0, data = (nil)), line 68 in "testflock.c"
Unfortunately I can't quit from dbx except by killing it with
SIGTERM. On the other hand, when compiling and running the tests
in /tmp, testflock completed successfully.
> > After removing the testflock case, testsockets segfaults.
In sendto_receivefrom(), the calls to apr_sockaddr_get_info()
fail with, essentially, EAI_NONAME from getaddrinfo(), and this
results in NULL 'from' and 'to' sockaddrs => segfault when
apr_socket_bind() is passed a NULL sockaddr.
Regards,
Joonas
Re: [VOTE] 1.2.3 releases
Posted by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>.
On 1/29/06, M Joonas Pihlaja <jp...@cc.helsinki.fi> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Garrett Rooney wrote:
>
> > Tarballs for 1.2.3 are now available for testing in
> > http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
> >
> > +1 -1 for release:
> > [ ] [X] apr-1.2.3
>
> - Solaris 9/sparc/gcc 3.4 & sun studio 11 cc
>
> SunOS mitzi 5.9 Generic_118558-09 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-Enterprise
>
> testflock hangs the process, and after vigorous killing, the
> process becomes a zombie. After removing the testflock case,
> testsockets segfaults. After removing testsockets, all other
> tests pass. This happens with apr compiled with either gcc or
> Sun's cc.
If you could debug any of these test failures it'd be most
appreciated. The segfault is particularly distrurbing...
> - win32 / MSVC 2003
>
> readwrite.c fails to compile because apr_file_write() uses an
> undeclared local "timemilliseconds" when it probably wants to use
> "timeout_ms". I couldn't get the tests to run on windows as I'm
> missing awk.
Looks like this was already fixed in trunk, and I missed it when
backporting changes because I thought it was just fixing a warning,
turned out to also be fixing a compile error. Oops. Guess we'll have
to roll new tarballs to fix that one...
-garrett
Re: [VOTE] 1.2.3 releases
Posted by M Joonas Pihlaja <jp...@cc.helsinki.fi>.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> Tarballs for 1.2.3 are now available for testing in
> http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> +1 -1 for release:
> [ ] [X] apr-1.2.3
- Solaris 9/sparc/gcc 3.4 & sun studio 11 cc
SunOS mitzi 5.9 Generic_118558-09 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-Enterprise
testflock hangs the process, and after vigorous killing, the
process becomes a zombie. After removing the testflock case,
testsockets segfaults. After removing testsockets, all other
tests pass. This happens with apr compiled with either gcc or
Sun's cc.
- win32 / MSVC 2003
readwrite.c fails to compile because apr_file_write() uses an
undeclared local "timemilliseconds" when it probably wants to use
"timeout_ms". I couldn't get the tests to run on windows as I'm
missing awk.
Regards.
Joonas
Re: [VOTE] 1.2.3 releases
Posted by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>.
On 1/29/06, Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Garrett Rooney wrote:
>
> > On 1/29/06, Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com> wrote:
> >> Garrett Rooney wrote:
> >>> On 1/26/06, Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
> >>>> Tarballs for 1.2.3 are now available for testing in
> >>>> http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 -1 for release:
> >>>> [ ] [ ] apr-1.2.3
> >>>> [ ] [ ] apr-util-1.2.3
> >>>>
> >>>> Vote early, vote often.
> >>>
> >>> So we've currently got 4 +1 votes, across a fair variety of platforms.
> >>> I'd really like to get a few more systems covered though, off the top
> >>> of my head it would be nice to get builds from win32 and Solaris 10.
>
> On Win32, both with apr-1.2.3 and apr-0.9.8, I get a
> compile error:
> apr-1.2.3\file_io\win32\readwrite.c(326) : error C2065:
> 'timemilliseconds' : undeclared identifier
> It looks like the first diff at
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-commits/?format=atom
> may be relevant here?
I already fixed this compile problem, and will probably be rolling new
tarballs (with updated version numbers) to fix the problem later
tonight.
-garrett
Re: [VOTE] 1.2.3 releases
Posted by Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca>.
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 1/29/06, Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com> wrote:
>> Garrett Rooney wrote:
>>> On 1/26/06, Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
>>>> Tarballs for 1.2.3 are now available for testing in
>>>> http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>>>
>>>> +1 -1 for release:
>>>> [ ] [ ] apr-1.2.3
>>>> [ ] [ ] apr-util-1.2.3
>>>>
>>>> Vote early, vote often.
>>>
>>> So we've currently got 4 +1 votes, across a fair variety of platforms.
>>> I'd really like to get a few more systems covered though, off the top
>>> of my head it would be nice to get builds from win32 and Solaris 10.
On Win32, both with apr-1.2.3 and apr-0.9.8, I get a
compile error:
apr-1.2.3\file_io\win32\readwrite.c(326) : error C2065:
'timemilliseconds' : undeclared identifier
It looks like the first diff at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-commits/?format=atom
may be relevant here?
--
best regards,
Randy Kobes
Re: [VOTE] 1.2.3 releases
Posted by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>.
On 1/29/06, Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com> wrote:
> Garrett Rooney wrote:
> > On 1/26/06, Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
> >> Tarballs for 1.2.3 are now available for testing in
> >> http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
> >>
> >> +1 -1 for release:
> >> [ ] [ ] apr-1.2.3
> >> [ ] [ ] apr-util-1.2.3
> >>
> >> Vote early, vote often.
> >
> > So we've currently got 4 +1 votes, across a fair variety of platforms.
> > I'd really like to get a few more systems covered though, off the top
> > of my head it would be nice to get builds from win32 and Solaris 10.
>
> Solaris 10/x86:
>
> testpoll : -Line 314: expected <5>, but saw <4>
> FAILED 1 of 13
> (This is a regression from 1.2.2....)
Is this another of those new poll tests that are having issues?
> testsockets is also having issues, it is failing to bind to the
> listening port the second time that it runs..... But this is not a
> regression from 1.2.2.
Well, at least it's not a new problem...
-garrett
Re: [VOTE] 1.2.3 releases
Posted by Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>.
Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 1/26/06, Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
>> Tarballs for 1.2.3 are now available for testing in
>> http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>
>> +1 -1 for release:
>> [ ] [ ] apr-1.2.3
>> [ ] [ ] apr-util-1.2.3
>>
>> Vote early, vote often.
>
> So we've currently got 4 +1 votes, across a fair variety of platforms.
> I'd really like to get a few more systems covered though, off the top
> of my head it would be nice to get builds from win32 and Solaris 10.
Solaris 10/x86:
testpoll : -Line 314: expected <5>, but saw <4>
FAILED 1 of 13
(This is a regression from 1.2.2....)
testsockets is also having issues, it is failing to bind to the
listening port the second time that it runs..... But this is not a
regression from 1.2.2.
-Paul
Re: [VOTE] 1.2.3 releases
Posted by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>.
On 1/26/06, Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
> Tarballs for 1.2.3 are now available for testing in
> http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> +1 -1 for release:
> [ ] [ ] apr-1.2.3
> [ ] [ ] apr-util-1.2.3
>
> Vote early, vote often.
So we've currently got 4 +1 votes, across a fair variety of platforms.
I'd really like to get a few more systems covered though, off the top
of my head it would be nice to get builds from win32 and Solaris 10.
I can give win32 a try later today, although I'll be working with the
Visual Studio Express stuff rather than VC++ 6.0 which is what our
build system seems to be currently geared towards, so I'm sure I'll
have to make some manual tweaks to get it to work. If someone with a
more conventional win32 build setup could give things a shot I'd
certainly appreciate it.
-garrett
Re: [VOTE] 1.2.3 releases
Posted by Brad Nicholes <BN...@novell.com>.
>>> On 1/26/2006 at 11:42:17 pm, in message
<7e...@mail.gmail.com>, Garrett
Rooney
<ro...@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
> Tarballs for 1.2.3 are now available for testing in
> http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> +1 -1 for release:
> [X ] [ ] apr-1.2.3
> [X ] [ ] apr-util-1.2.3
>
> Vote early, vote often.
>
> -garret
NetWare
Brad
Re: [VOTE] 1.2.3 releases
Posted by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>.
On 1/26/06, Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
> Tarballs for 1.2.3 are now available for testing in
> http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> +1 -1 for release:
> [x] [ ] apr-1.2.3
> [x] [ ] apr-util-1.2.3
>
> Vote early, vote often.
I'm +1 here, but I should note that there is a potential issue with a
failing poll test, see my recent email with the subject
"apr_pollset_poll test failures in 1.2.3 release" for details.
Personally, I'm in the "the test is wrong, go forward with release"
camp myself.
-garrett
Re: [VOTE] 1.2.3 releases
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Tested as well (sorry for the delay):
+1: Sol8, Suse 10.0, OS X 10.4.4
On Jan 27, 2006, at 1:42 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> Tarballs for 1.2.3 are now available for testing in
> http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> +1 -1 for release:
> [ ] [ ] apr-1.2.3
> [ ] [ ] apr-util-1.2.3
>
> Vote early, vote often.
>
> -garrett
>