You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Kuhu Shukla (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/04/08 16:31:25 UTC

[jira] [Reopened] (YARN-4311) Removing nodes from include and exclude lists will not remove them from decommissioned nodes list

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Kuhu Shukla reopened YARN-4311:
-------------------------------

> Removing nodes from include and exclude lists will not remove them from decommissioned nodes list
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4311
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4311
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.1
>            Reporter: Kuhu Shukla
>            Assignee: Kuhu Shukla
>             Fix For: 2.8.0
>
>         Attachments: YARN-4311-branch-2.7.001.patch, YARN-4311-v1.patch, YARN-4311-v10.patch, YARN-4311-v11.patch, YARN-4311-v11.patch, YARN-4311-v12.patch, YARN-4311-v13.patch, YARN-4311-v13.patch, YARN-4311-v14.patch, YARN-4311-v2.patch, YARN-4311-v3.patch, YARN-4311-v4.patch, YARN-4311-v5.patch, YARN-4311-v6.patch, YARN-4311-v7.patch, YARN-4311-v8.patch, YARN-4311-v9.patch
>
>
> In order to fully forget about a node, removing the node from include and exclude list is not sufficient. The RM lists it under Decomm-ed nodes. The tricky part that [~jlowe] pointed out was the case when include lists are not used, in that case we don't want the nodes to fall off if they are not active.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)