You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by "Davanum Srinivas (JIRA)" <ax...@ws.apache.org> on 2005/01/26 13:45:17 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (AXIS-1770) ArrayListExtension Implementation
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1770?page=history ]
Davanum Srinivas resolved AXIS-1770:
------------------------------------
Resolution: Invalid
Nishant,
Please let me know where this bug affects some processing/functionality and i'll reopen the bug.
thanks,
dims
> ArrayListExtension Implementation
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: AXIS-1770
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1770
> Project: Axis
> Type: Bug
> Components: Serialization/Deserialization
> Versions: current (nightly)
> Reporter: nishant kumar
>
> In the ArrayDeserializer class there is an inner class ArrayListExtension.
> In the second constructor of this class, the one which takes length as
> parameter, why do we create such a large array when the array we
> normally use is of very small size. why don't we create an array of size
> length. Are we not wasting memory here?
> here is another problem that may lead to a bug somewhere.
> In both the constructor of the ArrayListExtension, one sets the
> passed arrayClass = null based on some condition instead of setting
> the instance variable.
> should it not be
> if (arrayClass == null ||
> arrayClass.isInterface() ||
> java.lang.reflect.Modifier.isAbstract(
> arrayClass.getModifiers())) {
> this.arrayClass = null;
> }
> instead of
> if (arrayClass == null ||
> arrayClass.isInterface() ||
> java.lang.reflect.Modifier.isAbstract(
> arrayClass.getModifiers())) {
> arrayClass = null;
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira