You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org> on 2002/06/26 13:29:10 UTC
Gump failures
Hi Sam,
The TC nightly builds from Gump have been failing for a while because of
MX4J, which is apparently failing because some custom Ant task cannot be
found.
Is someone trying to fix it ?
So far, Gump has failed to generate a single nightly for TC 4.1. That's
not too good :-(
Remy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Gump failures
Posted by co...@covalent.net.
There is also a 4th option - cheat gump :-)
Remove the declared dependency on mx4j and use the binary distribution
on mx4j ( just like we do for jsse for example ). At least temporary.
Costin
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > >
> > > The TC nightly builds from Gump have been failing for a while because of
> > > MX4J, which is apparently failing because some custom Ant task cannot be
> > > found.
> >
> > Xdoclet changed the package names for their classes without deprecation.
> > MX4J still uses the old names.
> >
> > > Is someone trying to fix it ?
> >
> > Stefan Bodewig has been tracking this.
> >
> > > So far, Gump has failed to generate a single nightly for TC 4.1. That's
> > > not too good :-(
> >
> > Options:
> >
> > 1) Work with the Xdoclet team to convince them of the need of deprecation.
> >
> > 2) Work with the MX4J team to encourage them to keep up.
> >
> > 3) Use Sun's JMX.
>
> Thanks for the details Sam. It looked to me like a Gump limitation with Ant
> tasks handling, or something like it.
>
> Using 3) is not an option, as the JMX implementation must be shipped with
> the build, and the JMX RI has big problems in the licensing area.
>
> 1) and 2) look like good solutions, but they will obviously teake some time.
>
> Remy
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Gump failures
Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >
> > The TC nightly builds from Gump have been failing for a while because of
> > MX4J, which is apparently failing because some custom Ant task cannot be
> > found.
>
> Xdoclet changed the package names for their classes without deprecation.
> MX4J still uses the old names.
>
> > Is someone trying to fix it ?
>
> Stefan Bodewig has been tracking this.
>
> > So far, Gump has failed to generate a single nightly for TC 4.1. That's
> > not too good :-(
>
> Options:
>
> 1) Work with the Xdoclet team to convince them of the need of deprecation.
>
> 2) Work with the MX4J team to encourage them to keep up.
>
> 3) Use Sun's JMX.
Thanks for the details Sam. It looked to me like a Gump limitation with Ant
tasks handling, or something like it.
Using 3) is not an option, as the JMX implementation must be shipped with
the build, and the JMX RI has big problems in the licensing area.
1) and 2) look like good solutions, but they will obviously teake some time.
Remy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Gump failures
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org> wrote:
> Xdoclet changed the package names for their classes without
> deprecation. MX4J still uses the old names.
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
>> Is someone trying to fix it ?
>
> Stefan Bodewig has been tracking this.
I opened a problem report with MX4J (and provided a patch for their
build file). No response yet. I have just now increased the priority
a bit.
<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=570615&group_id=47745&atid=450647>
And I have opened a problem report with xdoclet (just now):
<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=574102&group_id=31602&atid=402707>
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Gump failures
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org> wrote:
> Xdoclet changed the package names for their classes without
> deprecation. MX4J still uses the old names.
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
>> Is someone trying to fix it ?
>
> Stefan Bodewig has been tracking this.
I opened a problem report with MX4J (and provided a patch for their
build file). No response yet. I have just now increased the priority
a bit.
<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=570615&group_id=47745&atid=450647>
And I have opened a problem report with xdoclet (just now):
<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=574102&group_id=31602&atid=402707>
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Gump failures
Posted by Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org>.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> The TC nightly builds from Gump have been failing for a while because of
> MX4J, which is apparently failing because some custom Ant task cannot be
> found.
Xdoclet changed the package names for their classes without deprecation.
MX4J still uses the old names.
> Is someone trying to fix it ?
Stefan Bodewig has been tracking this.
> So far, Gump has failed to generate a single nightly for TC 4.1. That's
> not too good :-(
Options:
1) Work with the Xdoclet team to convince them of the need of deprecation.
2) Work with the MX4J team to encourage them to keep up.
3) Use Sun's JMX.
- Sam Ruby
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Gump failures
Posted by Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org>.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> The TC nightly builds from Gump have been failing for a while because of
> MX4J, which is apparently failing because some custom Ant task cannot be
> found.
Xdoclet changed the package names for their classes without deprecation.
MX4J still uses the old names.
> Is someone trying to fix it ?
Stefan Bodewig has been tracking this.
> So far, Gump has failed to generate a single nightly for TC 4.1. That's
> not too good :-(
Options:
1) Work with the Xdoclet team to convince them of the need of deprecation.
2) Work with the MX4J team to encourage them to keep up.
3) Use Sun's JMX.
- Sam Ruby
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>