You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2008/06/26 23:08:44 UTC
hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 4 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate
4 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 3 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release
candidate 2]]]
Release candidate 4 was voted down because HBASE-613 needed more
attention and because we weren't splitting under loads if a schema with
many families: HBASE-707. We also found a deadlock, HBASE-709 and
another area in which we were susceptible to (very) bad clock skew:
HBASE-710. All these issues have been fixed in the new candidate.
Release candidate 5 is available for download here:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-5/
Please try it out and let us know if any issues.
Known issues: HBASE-713 Onlining/Offlining of tables is not reliable on
biggish tables (hundreds of regions).
Lets make the voting period short, tomorrow, Friday, June 26th.
The HBase Team
stack wrote:
> Release candidate 4 adds a fix for HBASE-613:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-4/
>
> Please try it and let us know if issues. Voting closes on Tuesday,
> June 24th.
>
> Thanks,
> Your HBase Team
>
>
> stack wrote:
>> Michael Bieniosek reports I'd mangled release candidate 2.
>>
>> Here is release candidate 3:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-3/
>>
>> Please take it for a spin. Voting (again) closes Friday, June 20th.
>>
>> This release only runs on hadoop 0.16.x.
>>
>> Yours,
>> HBase Team
>>
>>
>> stack wrote:
>>> Here's a new 0.1.3 release candidate:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-2/
>>>
>>> Please try it out. Voting closes Friday, June 20th.
>>>
>>> (Candidate 1 was squashed because a couple of more fixes came in:
>>> HBASE-680, HBASE-684, and HBASE-686)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> The HBase Team
>>
>
RE: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 4 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 4 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 3 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 2]]]
Posted by Jonathan Gray <jg...@streamy.com>.
+1
Ran test cases against HBASE-707 and HBASE-710. Successful splits, server
throws NSRE rather than a ISE to the client during splits.
Jonathan Gray, Streamy.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Kellerman [mailto:jim@powerset.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 3:45 PM
To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: RE: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 4 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release
candidate 4 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 3 [WAS -> Re:
hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 2]]]
Downloaded, reviewed docs ran some tests on Windows.
+1
---
Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stack [mailto:stack@duboce.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:09 PM
> To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
> Cc: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 4 [WAS -> Re:
> hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 4 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3
> release candidate 3 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 2]]]
>
> Release candidate 4 was voted down because HBASE-613 needed
> more attention and because we weren't splitting under loads
> if a schema with many families: HBASE-707. We also found a
> deadlock, HBASE-709 and another area in which we were
> susceptible to (very) bad clock skew:
> HBASE-710. All these issues have been fixed in the new candidate.
>
> Release candidate 5 is available for download here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-5/
>
> Please try it out and let us know if any issues.
>
> Known issues: HBASE-713 Onlining/Offlining of tables is not
> reliable on biggish tables (hundreds of regions).
>
> Lets make the voting period short, tomorrow, Friday, June 26th.
>
> The HBase Team
>
>
>
> stack wrote:
> > Release candidate 4 adds a fix for HBASE-613:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-4/
> >
> > Please try it and let us know if issues. Voting closes on Tuesday,
> > June 24th.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Your HBase Team
> >
> >
> > stack wrote:
> >> Michael Bieniosek reports I'd mangled release candidate 2.
> >>
> >> Here is release candidate 3:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-3/
> >>
> >> Please take it for a spin. Voting (again) closes Friday,
> June 20th.
> >>
> >> This release only runs on hadoop 0.16.x.
> >>
> >> Yours,
> >> HBase Team
> >>
> >>
> >> stack wrote:
> >>> Here's a new 0.1.3 release candidate:
> >>>
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-2/
> >>>
> >>> Please try it out. Voting closes Friday, June 20th.
> >>>
> >>> (Candidate 1 was squashed because a couple of more fixes came in:
> >>> HBASE-680, HBASE-684, and HBASE-686)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> The HBase Team
> >>
> >
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.101 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1521 - Release
> Date: 6/26/2008 11:20 AM
>
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.101 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1521 - Release Date: 6/26/2008
11:20 AM
RE: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 4 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release
candidate 4 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 3 [WAS -> Re:
hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 2]]]
Posted by Jim Kellerman <ji...@powerset.com>.
Downloaded, reviewed docs ran some tests on Windows.
+1
---
Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stack [mailto:stack@duboce.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:09 PM
> To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
> Cc: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 4 [WAS -> Re:
> hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 4 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3
> release candidate 3 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 2]]]
>
> Release candidate 4 was voted down because HBASE-613 needed
> more attention and because we weren't splitting under loads
> if a schema with many families: HBASE-707. We also found a
> deadlock, HBASE-709 and another area in which we were
> susceptible to (very) bad clock skew:
> HBASE-710. All these issues have been fixed in the new candidate.
>
> Release candidate 5 is available for download here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-5/
>
> Please try it out and let us know if any issues.
>
> Known issues: HBASE-713 Onlining/Offlining of tables is not
> reliable on biggish tables (hundreds of regions).
>
> Lets make the voting period short, tomorrow, Friday, June 26th.
>
> The HBase Team
>
>
>
> stack wrote:
> > Release candidate 4 adds a fix for HBASE-613:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-4/
> >
> > Please try it and let us know if issues. Voting closes on Tuesday,
> > June 24th.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Your HBase Team
> >
> >
> > stack wrote:
> >> Michael Bieniosek reports I'd mangled release candidate 2.
> >>
> >> Here is release candidate 3:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-3/
> >>
> >> Please take it for a spin. Voting (again) closes Friday,
> June 20th.
> >>
> >> This release only runs on hadoop 0.16.x.
> >>
> >> Yours,
> >> HBase Team
> >>
> >>
> >> stack wrote:
> >>> Here's a new 0.1.3 release candidate:
> >>>
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-2/
> >>>
> >>> Please try it out. Voting closes Friday, June 20th.
> >>>
> >>> (Candidate 1 was squashed because a couple of more fixes came in:
> >>> HBASE-680, HBASE-684, and HBASE-686)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> The HBase Team
> >>
> >
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.101 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1521 - Release
> Date: 6/26/2008 11:20 AM
>
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.101 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1521 - Release Date: 6/26/2008 11:20 AM
Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 4 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 4 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 3 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 2]]]
Posted by Bryan Duxbury <br...@rapleaf.com>.
I downloaded and ran the test suite. Everything passed. +1
-Bryan
On Jun 26, 2008, at 2:08 PM, stack wrote:
> Release candidate 4 was voted down because HBASE-613 needed more
> attention and because we weren't splitting under loads if a schema
> with many families: HBASE-707. We also found a deadlock, HBASE-709
> and another area in which we were susceptible to (very) bad clock
> skew: HBASE-710. All these issues have been fixed in the new
> candidate.
>
> Release candidate 5 is available for download here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-5/
>
> Please try it out and let us know if any issues.
>
> Known issues: HBASE-713 Onlining/Offlining of tables is not
> reliable on biggish tables (hundreds of regions).
>
> Lets make the voting period short, tomorrow, Friday, June 26th.
>
> The HBase Team
>
>
>
> stack wrote:
>> Release candidate 4 adds a fix for HBASE-613:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-4/
>>
>> Please try it and let us know if issues. Voting closes on
>> Tuesday, June 24th.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Your HBase Team
>>
>>
>> stack wrote:
>>> Michael Bieniosek reports I'd mangled release candidate 2.
>>>
>>> Here is release candidate 3:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-3/
>>>
>>> Please take it for a spin. Voting (again) closes Friday, June 20th.
>>>
>>> This release only runs on hadoop 0.16.x.
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>> HBase Team
>>>
>>>
>>> stack wrote:
>>>> Here's a new 0.1.3 release candidate:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-2/
>>>>
>>>> Please try it out. Voting closes Friday, June 20th.
>>>>
>>>> (Candidate 1 was squashed because a couple of more fixes came
>>>> in: HBASE-680, HBASE-684, and HBASE-686)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> The HBase Team
>>>
>>
>
Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 4 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release
candidate 4 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 3 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3
release candidate 2]]]
Posted by stack <st...@duboce.net>.
+1
Ran hbase torture test, checked out documentation, and ran unit tests.
St.Ack
stack wrote:
> Release candidate 4 was voted down because HBASE-613 needed more
> attention and because we weren't splitting under loads if a schema
> with many families: HBASE-707. We also found a deadlock, HBASE-709
> and another area in which we were susceptible to (very) bad clock
> skew: HBASE-710. All these issues have been fixed in the new candidate.
>
> Release candidate 5 is available for download here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-5/
>
> Please try it out and let us know if any issues.
>
> Known issues: HBASE-713 Onlining/Offlining of tables is not reliable
> on biggish tables (hundreds of regions).
>
> Lets make the voting period short, tomorrow, Friday, June 26th.
>
> The HBase Team
>
>
>
> stack wrote:
>> Release candidate 4 adds a fix for HBASE-613:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-4/
>>
>> Please try it and let us know if issues. Voting closes on Tuesday,
>> June 24th.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Your HBase Team
>>
>>
>> stack wrote:
>>> Michael Bieniosek reports I'd mangled release candidate 2.
>>>
>>> Here is release candidate 3:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-3/
>>>
>>> Please take it for a spin. Voting (again) closes Friday, June 20th.
>>>
>>> This release only runs on hadoop 0.16.x.
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>> HBase Team
>>>
>>>
>>> stack wrote:
>>>> Here's a new 0.1.3 release candidate:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-2/
>>>>
>>>> Please try it out. Voting closes Friday, June 20th.
>>>>
>>>> (Candidate 1 was squashed because a couple of more fixes came in:
>>>> HBASE-680, HBASE-684, and HBASE-686)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> The HBase Team
>>>
>>
>
Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 4 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release
candidate 4 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 3 [WAS -> Re: hbase-0.1.3
release candidate 2]]]
Posted by stack <st...@duboce.net>.
+1
Ran hbase torture test, checked out documentation, and ran unit tests.
St.Ack
stack wrote:
> Release candidate 4 was voted down because HBASE-613 needed more
> attention and because we weren't splitting under loads if a schema
> with many families: HBASE-707. We also found a deadlock, HBASE-709
> and another area in which we were susceptible to (very) bad clock
> skew: HBASE-710. All these issues have been fixed in the new candidate.
>
> Release candidate 5 is available for download here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-5/
>
> Please try it out and let us know if any issues.
>
> Known issues: HBASE-713 Onlining/Offlining of tables is not reliable
> on biggish tables (hundreds of regions).
>
> Lets make the voting period short, tomorrow, Friday, June 26th.
>
> The HBase Team
>
>
>
> stack wrote:
>> Release candidate 4 adds a fix for HBASE-613:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-4/
>>
>> Please try it and let us know if issues. Voting closes on Tuesday,
>> June 24th.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Your HBase Team
>>
>>
>> stack wrote:
>>> Michael Bieniosek reports I'd mangled release candidate 2.
>>>
>>> Here is release candidate 3:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-3/
>>>
>>> Please take it for a spin. Voting (again) closes Friday, June 20th.
>>>
>>> This release only runs on hadoop 0.16.x.
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>> HBase Team
>>>
>>>
>>> stack wrote:
>>>> Here's a new 0.1.3 release candidate:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-2/
>>>>
>>>> Please try it out. Voting closes Friday, June 20th.
>>>>
>>>> (Candidate 1 was squashed because a couple of more fixes came in:
>>>> HBASE-680, HBASE-684, and HBASE-686)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> The HBase Team
>>>
>>
>