You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jspwiki.apache.org by "Harry Metske (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/01/13 14:22:13 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (JSPWIKI-276) Use jabsorb instead of jsonrpc

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13552196#comment-13552196 ] 

Harry Metske commented on JSPWIKI-276:
--------------------------------------

Hmmm, jabsorb doesn't seem to be maintained either anymore now. Cannot find the UpgradeGuide, many Google searches end up in http://code.google.com/p/jabsorb where I don't find anything useful except the downloads.

Seems they continued again with json-rpc ?: http://code.google.com/p/json-rpc/ .

I personally do not have much knowledge or experience with json.
Does anyone else have a good suggestion where to go (or just leave it the way it is) ?
                
> Use jabsorb instead of jsonrpc
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JSPWIKI-276
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-276
>             Project: JSPWiki
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.2, 2.9.1
>            Reporter: Jorge Ferrer
>            Assignee: Harry Metske
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> jsonrpc seems to be unmaintained and jabsorb (http://jabsorb.org/) seems to be the new fork of that project. Migrating should to be quite simple.
> Besides the new features added to jabsorb, a very good reason to migrate is because this type library is sensitive to security related bugs so it's very desired to use one that is well maintained. Just in case.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Re: [jira] [Commented] (JSPWIKI-276) Use jabsorb instead of jsonrpc

Posted by Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>.
Yes, the rpc libraries were quite terrible at the time. +1 on using Jackson. The documentation is lacking in examples, but I can vouch for it being both reliable and fast.

/Janne

On Jan 13, 2013, at 16:18 , Andrew Jaquith <an...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Two quick points:
> 
> 1. In the 3.0 branch I used Jackson, which worked pretty well and is fast
> 2. The Stripes interceptor in 3.0 includes code that automatically decodes JSON (using Jackson) and dispatches to the correct action based on URL. It essentially gets rid of the bridge.
> 
> On Jan 13, 2013, at 8:22 AM, "Harry Metske (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>   [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13552196#comment-13552196 ] 
>> 
>> Harry Metske commented on JSPWIKI-276:
>> --------------------------------------
>> 
>> Hmmm, jabsorb doesn't seem to be maintained either anymore now. Cannot find the UpgradeGuide, many Google searches end up in http://code.google.com/p/jabsorb where I don't find anything useful except the downloads.
>> 
>> Seems they continued again with json-rpc ?: http://code.google.com/p/json-rpc/ .
>> 
>> I personally do not have much knowledge or experience with json.
>> Does anyone else have a good suggestion where to go (or just leave it the way it is) ?
>> 
>>> Use jabsorb instead of jsonrpc
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>>               Key: JSPWIKI-276
>>>               URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-276
>>>           Project: JSPWiki
>>>        Issue Type: Improvement
>>>  Affects Versions: 2.6.2, 2.9.1
>>>          Reporter: Jorge Ferrer
>>>          Assignee: Harry Metske
>>>          Priority: Trivial
>>>           Fix For: 3.0
>>> 
>>> 
>>> jsonrpc seems to be unmaintained and jabsorb (http://jabsorb.org/) seems to be the new fork of that project. Migrating should to be quite simple.
>>> Besides the new features added to jabsorb, a very good reason to migrate is because this type library is sensitive to security related bugs so it's very desired to use one that is well maintained. Just in case.
>> 
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
>> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Re: [jira] [Commented] (JSPWIKI-276) Use jabsorb instead of jsonrpc

Posted by Andrew Jaquith <an...@gmail.com>.
Two quick points:

1. In the 3.0 branch I used Jackson, which worked pretty well and is fast
2. The Stripes interceptor in 3.0 includes code that automatically decodes JSON (using Jackson) and dispatches to the correct action based on URL. It essentially gets rid of the bridge.

On Jan 13, 2013, at 8:22 AM, "Harry Metske (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> wrote:

> 
>    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13552196#comment-13552196 ] 
> 
> Harry Metske commented on JSPWIKI-276:
> --------------------------------------
> 
> Hmmm, jabsorb doesn't seem to be maintained either anymore now. Cannot find the UpgradeGuide, many Google searches end up in http://code.google.com/p/jabsorb where I don't find anything useful except the downloads.
> 
> Seems they continued again with json-rpc ?: http://code.google.com/p/json-rpc/ .
> 
> I personally do not have much knowledge or experience with json.
> Does anyone else have a good suggestion where to go (or just leave it the way it is) ?
> 
>> Use jabsorb instead of jsonrpc
>> ------------------------------
>> 
>>                Key: JSPWIKI-276
>>                URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-276
>>            Project: JSPWiki
>>         Issue Type: Improvement
>>   Affects Versions: 2.6.2, 2.9.1
>>           Reporter: Jorge Ferrer
>>           Assignee: Harry Metske
>>           Priority: Trivial
>>            Fix For: 3.0
>> 
>> 
>> jsonrpc seems to be unmaintained and jabsorb (http://jabsorb.org/) seems to be the new fork of that project. Migrating should to be quite simple.
>> Besides the new features added to jabsorb, a very good reason to migrate is because this type library is sensitive to security related bugs so it's very desired to use one that is well maintained. Just in case.
> 
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira