You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@solr.apache.org by "Jan Høydahl (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2024/01/12 14:25:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-17111) Standardize system property naming

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17806066#comment-17806066 ] 

Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-17111:
------------------------------------

See [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/System+property+naming+structure] for a working document listing all existing sysProps in use, and a possible standardization of the naming structure. This Jira is about normalizing syntax for a subset of system properties not currently conforming to the solr.foo.bar syntax. A complete rename for all properties may or may not come later, but dropping the link in here since the topics are related.

> Standardize system property naming
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-17111
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17111
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Jan Høydahl
>            Priority: Major
>
> Followup from SOLR-15960.
> This Jira will standardize naming of system properties in use by Solr with rules
>  * Lowercase {{[a-z0-9\.]}} only
>  * All props start with {{solr.}}
>  * All props === env.var (when uppercased and {{{}.replace("-","_"){}}})
> See [EnvToSyspropMappings.properties|https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/solr/core/src/resources/EnvToSyspropMappings.properties] for a list of identified non-standard system property names. It may not be complete. And some are impossible to change, such as {{{}SOLR_PORT=jetty.port{}}}.
> I think it makes sense to add one child-task for each of the vars we want to standardize, so we can target one variable/property at a time. The process will be (using {{enable.packages}} as example:
>  # Make our code and docs use "solr.enable.packages" everywhere
>  # Make sure the old sysprop still works in 9.x (This may be automated using the properties file above)
>  # Make a note in 9.x upgrade notes that "-Denable.packages" is deprecated
>  # Add a section to 10.0 major changes that "-Denable.packages" no longer works from 10.0
>  # Add a test? Perhaps it is enough to test the EnvUtils logic, i.e. that no matter which way you set the env/property our code {{EnvUtils.getProp("solr.enable.packages")}} gets hold of it?
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@solr.apache.org