You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Rick Hillegas (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/07/10 20:45:05 UTC

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-716) Re-enable VTIs

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12511533 ] 

Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-716:
-------------------------------------

Committed derby-716-01-basic-aa.diff at subversion revision 555032. I merged again today. All of the regression tests ran cleanly for me except for the wisconsin test. That test shows the following diff. It shows this diff even in a clean subversion client without my patch:

28712a28713
> 0
28715a28717
> 0
Test Failed.


> Re-enable VTIs
> --------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-716
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-716
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: SQL
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>            Assignee: Rick Hillegas
>         Attachments: derby-716-01-basic-aa.diff, functionTables.html, functionTables.html, functionTables.html
>
>
> Cloudscape used to expose Virtual Table Interfaces, by which any class which implemented ResultSet could be included in a query's FROM list. Derby still exposes a number of these VTIs as diagnostic tools. However, Derby now prevents customers from declaring their own VTIs. The parser raises an error if a VTI's package isn't one of the Derby diagnostic packages.
> This is a very powerful feature which customers can use to solve many problems. We should discuss the reasons that it was disabled and come up with a plan for putting this power back into our customers' hands.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-716) Re-enable VTIs

Posted by Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com>.
On 7/10/07, Rick Hillegas (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
> [...snip...] All of the regression tests ran cleanly for me except for the wisconsin test. That test shows the following diff. It shows this diff even in a clean subversion client without my patch:
>
> 28712a28713
> > 0
> 28715a28717
> > 0
> Test Failed.
>
>
That test has been failing in the tinderbox for the last couple of
days. I know  nothing further, only noticed it failed.

Myrna