You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@logging.apache.org by Davyd McColl <da...@codeo.co.za.INVALID> on 2022/07/25 07:52:45 UTC
[VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.15
Hi all
It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
@Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
Thanks
-d
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.15
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
+1
I validated the signatures and hashes. I also don’t have a .NET environment so didn’t build or test.
Ralph
> On Jul 25, 2022, at 12:52 AM, Davyd McColl <da...@codeo.co.za.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
>
> This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
>
> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
>
> Thanks
> -d
Re: log4net 2.0.15 vote
Posted by Davyd McColl <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi all
Thanks for the votes, 2.0.15 is now live.
-d
On Aug 4 2022, at 5:14 am, Davyd McColl <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ralph
> Yes, I'll release as soon as I get a gap. I replied to the signing request too - not sure what happened to 2.0.14, but every other release is signed. The signing attribute was missing - I must have accidentally deleted it - I've added a test to check that it's in place and checked that the RC artifact assemblies are signed (that's the mystery: they are signed, even though I just added the signing attribute back 🤔. Oh well, now there's a test for it and tests are run as part of the release artifact generation, so if it happens again, at least I'll know).
> -e
>
> On 03 August 2022 22:00:34 Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> > Doesn’t this vote have the necessary 3 +1 votes? Davyd, I am assuming as release manager you will be voting +1.
> > However, see the request to sign stuff going to Nuget. You may want to do that before you send it there.
> > Ralph
> > > On Jul 28, 2022, at 10:06 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Same here. I can review over the weekend.
> > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:51 AM Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it until Saturday.
> > > > Ralph
> > > > > On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org (http://downloads.apache.org) until actually
> > > > > released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
> > > > > course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
> > > > > are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Robert Middleton
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
> > > > > <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all
> > > > > > It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
> > > > > > I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
> > > > > > I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
> > > > > > @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > -d
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: log4net 2.0.15 vote
Posted by Davyd McColl <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ralph
Yes, I'll release as soon as I get a gap. I replied to the signing request
too - not sure what happened to 2.0.14, but every other release is signed.
The signing attribute was missing - I must have accidentally deleted it -
I've added a test to check that it's in place and checked that the RC
artifact assemblies are signed (that's the mystery: they are signed, even
though I just added the signing attribute back 🤔. Oh well, now there's a
test for it and tests are run as part of the release artifact generation,
so if it happens again, at least I'll know).
-e
On 03 August 2022 22:00:34 Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> Doesn’t this vote have the necessary 3 +1 votes? Davyd, I am assuming as
> release manager you will be voting +1.
>
> However, see the request to sign stuff going to Nuget. You may want to do
> that before you send it there.
>
> Ralph
>
>> On Jul 28, 2022, at 10:06 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Same here. I can review over the weekend.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:51 AM Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it until
>>> Saturday.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>>> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
>>>> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
>>>> course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
>>>>
>>>> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
>>>> are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
>>>>
>>>> -Robert Middleton
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
>>>> <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>
>>>>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15
>>>>> release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details:
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
>>>>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
>>>>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at
>>>>> https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
>>>>>
>>>>> This is probably why download links from
>>>>> https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
>>>>>
>>>>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something
>>>>> obvious ):
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -d
>>>
>
Re: log4net 2.0.15 vote
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
Doesn’t this vote have the necessary 3 +1 votes? Davyd, I am assuming as release manager you will be voting +1.
However, see the request to sign stuff going to Nuget. You may want to do that before you send it there.
Ralph
> On Jul 28, 2022, at 10:06 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Same here. I can review over the weekend.
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:51 AM Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>
>> I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it until Saturday.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
>>> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
>>> course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
>>>
>>> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
>>> are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
>>>
>>> -Robert Middleton
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
>>> <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all
>>>>
>>>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
>>>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
>>>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
>>>>
>>>> This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
>>>>
>>>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -d
>>
Re: log4net 2.0.15 vote
Posted by Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>.
Same here. I can review over the weekend.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:51 AM Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
> I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it until Saturday.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
> > released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
> > course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
> >
> > I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
> > are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
> >
> > -Robert Middleton
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
> > <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
> >> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
> >> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
> >>
> >> This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
> >>
> >> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> -d
>
log4net 2.0.15 vote
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it until Saturday.
Ralph
> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
> course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
>
> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
> are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
>
> -Robert Middleton
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
> <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
>>
>> This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
>>
>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
>>
>> Thanks
>> -d
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.15
Posted by Davyd McColl <da...@gmail.com>.
I don't understand? There is an update at the staging site? What am I missing?
-d
On Jul 29 2022, at 10:37 pm, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> Also, is the web site being updated for the release. While not required for a release we usually have a web site to review with a release.
>
> Ralph
> > On Jul 29, 2022, at 1:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> >
> > Where is the zip of the source? The ASF releases source code. Binaries are for the user’s convenience.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> >> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
> >> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
> >> course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
> >>
> >> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
> >> are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
> >>
> >> -Robert Middleton
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
> >> <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all
> >>>
> >>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
> >>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
> >>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
> >>>
> >>> This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
> >>>
> >>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> -d
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.15
Posted by Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org>.
+1 from me - signatures and checksums look good. I didn't validate
anything else as I don't use .NET.
Note: You may want to not zip up the target/ directory, since that is
only for maven.
-Robert Middleton
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 6:26 PM Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
> But I just looked at dist/release/log4net and the artifacts are there. This means you have already released the artifacts publicly despite the vote having not completed. You cannot really remove them as they propagate to mirrors fairly quickly.
>
> You need to create a confluence page with the release process so you can follow it step by step. This allows anyone to perform the release and helps you to remember how to do it since it isn’t something that is done all that frequently.
>
> Ralph
>
>
>
> > On Jul 29, 2022, at 3:22 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> >
> > But never mind. Now that I look I see that dist/dev/log4net has a binaries and sources directory. I am used to the way log4j does it where they are together. So they are there.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> >> On Jul 29, 2022, at 3:20 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> You publish to dist/dev for the vote. We review it there. You then move it to dist/release after the vote passes. You obviously will not see them there - or publicly in the downloads until they are moved to the release directory when the vote passes.
> >>
> >> The ASF requires the source zip be in the downloads directory - which means they have to also be in the dist directory adjacent to the binaries. See https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#source-packages
> >>
> >> Ralph
> >>
> >>> On Jul 29, 2022, at 2:04 PM, Davyd McColl <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It is on GitHub (both in git and zip at the release), but having checked out the svn repo at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging/ on this machine, I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts that I added the other day, and that comes back to my question about them not showing up in the d/l locations :/ obviously, I'm doing Something Wrong.
> >>>
> >>> I've re-committed from my linux machine - perhaps with better effect?
> >>> -d
> >>> On Jul 29 2022, at 10:37 pm, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> >>>> Also, is the web site being updated for the release. While not required for a release we usually have a web site to review with a release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ralph
> >>>>> On Jul 29, 2022, at 1:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Where is the zip of the source? The ASF releases source code. Binaries are for the user’s convenience.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ralph
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
> >>>>>> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
> >>>>>> course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
> >>>>>> are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Robert Middleton
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
> >>>>>> <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi all
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
> >>>>>>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
> >>>>>>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>> -d
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.15
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
But I just looked at dist/release/log4net and the artifacts are there. This means you have already released the artifacts publicly despite the vote having not completed. You cannot really remove them as they propagate to mirrors fairly quickly.
You need to create a confluence page with the release process so you can follow it step by step. This allows anyone to perform the release and helps you to remember how to do it since it isn’t something that is done all that frequently.
Ralph
> On Jul 29, 2022, at 3:22 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
> But never mind. Now that I look I see that dist/dev/log4net has a binaries and sources directory. I am used to the way log4j does it where they are together. So they are there.
>
> Ralph
>
>> On Jul 29, 2022, at 3:20 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>
>> You publish to dist/dev for the vote. We review it there. You then move it to dist/release after the vote passes. You obviously will not see them there - or publicly in the downloads until they are moved to the release directory when the vote passes.
>>
>> The ASF requires the source zip be in the downloads directory - which means they have to also be in the dist directory adjacent to the binaries. See https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#source-packages
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>> On Jul 29, 2022, at 2:04 PM, Davyd McColl <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It is on GitHub (both in git and zip at the release), but having checked out the svn repo at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging/ on this machine, I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts that I added the other day, and that comes back to my question about them not showing up in the d/l locations :/ obviously, I'm doing Something Wrong.
>>>
>>> I've re-committed from my linux machine - perhaps with better effect?
>>> -d
>>> On Jul 29 2022, at 10:37 pm, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>>> Also, is the web site being updated for the release. While not required for a release we usually have a web site to review with a release.
>>>>
>>>> Ralph
>>>>> On Jul 29, 2022, at 1:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Where is the zip of the source? The ASF releases source code. Binaries are for the user’s convenience.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
>>>>>> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
>>>>>> course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
>>>>>> are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Robert Middleton
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
>>>>>> <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
>>>>>>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
>>>>>>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> -d
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.15
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
But never mind. Now that I look I see that dist/dev/log4net has a binaries and sources directory. I am used to the way log4j does it where they are together. So they are there.
Ralph
> On Jul 29, 2022, at 3:20 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
> You publish to dist/dev for the vote. We review it there. You then move it to dist/release after the vote passes. You obviously will not see them there - or publicly in the downloads until they are moved to the release directory when the vote passes.
>
> The ASF requires the source zip be in the downloads directory - which means they have to also be in the dist directory adjacent to the binaries. See https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#source-packages
>
> Ralph
>
>> On Jul 29, 2022, at 2:04 PM, Davyd McColl <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It is on GitHub (both in git and zip at the release), but having checked out the svn repo at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging/ on this machine, I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts that I added the other day, and that comes back to my question about them not showing up in the d/l locations :/ obviously, I'm doing Something Wrong.
>>
>> I've re-committed from my linux machine - perhaps with better effect?
>> -d
>> On Jul 29 2022, at 10:37 pm, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>> Also, is the web site being updated for the release. While not required for a release we usually have a web site to review with a release.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>> On Jul 29, 2022, at 1:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Where is the zip of the source? The ASF releases source code. Binaries are for the user’s convenience.
>>>>
>>>> Ralph
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
>>>>> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
>>>>> course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
>>>>> are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Robert Middleton
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
>>>>> <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
>>>>>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
>>>>>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> -d
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.15
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
You publish to dist/dev for the vote. We review it there. You then move it to dist/release after the vote passes. You obviously will not see them there - or publicly in the downloads until they are moved to the release directory when the vote passes.
The ASF requires the source zip be in the downloads directory - which means they have to also be in the dist directory adjacent to the binaries. See https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#source-packages
Ralph
> On Jul 29, 2022, at 2:04 PM, Davyd McColl <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It is on GitHub (both in git and zip at the release), but having checked out the svn repo at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging/ on this machine, I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts that I added the other day, and that comes back to my question about them not showing up in the d/l locations :/ obviously, I'm doing Something Wrong.
>
> I've re-committed from my linux machine - perhaps with better effect?
> -d
> On Jul 29 2022, at 10:37 pm, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>> Also, is the web site being updated for the release. While not required for a release we usually have a web site to review with a release.
>>
>> Ralph
>>> On Jul 29, 2022, at 1:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Where is the zip of the source? The ASF releases source code. Binaries are for the user’s convenience.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>>> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
>>>> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
>>>> course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
>>>>
>>>> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
>>>> are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
>>>>
>>>> -Robert Middleton
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
>>>> <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>
>>>>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
>>>>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
>>>>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
>>>>>
>>>>> This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
>>>>>
>>>>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -d
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.15
Posted by Davyd McColl <da...@gmail.com>.
It is on GitHub (both in git and zip at the release), but having checked out the svn repo at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging/ on this machine, I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts that I added the other day, and that comes back to my question about them not showing up in the d/l locations :/ obviously, I'm doing Something Wrong.
I've re-committed from my linux machine - perhaps with better effect?
-d
On Jul 29 2022, at 10:37 pm, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> Also, is the web site being updated for the release. While not required for a release we usually have a web site to review with a release.
>
> Ralph
> > On Jul 29, 2022, at 1:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> >
> > Where is the zip of the source? The ASF releases source code. Binaries are for the user’s convenience.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> >> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
> >> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
> >> course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
> >>
> >> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
> >> are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
> >>
> >> -Robert Middleton
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
> >> <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all
> >>>
> >>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
> >>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
> >>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
> >>>
> >>> This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
> >>>
> >>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> -d
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.15
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
Also, is the web site being updated for the release. While not required for a release we usually have a web site to review with a release.
Ralph
> On Jul 29, 2022, at 1:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
> Where is the zip of the source? The ASF releases source code. Binaries are for the user’s convenience.
>
> Ralph
>
>> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
>> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
>> course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
>>
>> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
>> are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
>>
>> -Robert Middleton
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
>> <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
>>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
>>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
>>>
>>> This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
>>>
>>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -d
>
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.15
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
Where is the zip of the source? The ASF releases source code. Binaries are for the user’s convenience.
Ralph
> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
> course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
>
> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
> are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
>
> -Robert Middleton
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
> <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
>>
>> This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
>>
>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
>>
>> Thanks
>> -d
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.15
Posted by Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org>.
The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
-Robert Middleton
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
<da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
>
> This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
>
> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
>
> Thanks
> -d