[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1972) Fix invalid volatile long/int increment (++)

["Raul Gutierrez Segales (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14067609#comment-14067609 ] 

Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-1972:
---------------------------------------------------

lgtm, +1.

[~phunt]: maybe we can pick this one up for 3.5.0?

> Fix invalid volatile long/int increment (++)
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1972
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1972
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.0
>            Reporter: Hongchao Deng
>            Assignee: Hongchao Deng
>             Fix For: 3.5.0
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1972.patch
>
>
> The findbugs complains about incrementing a volatile variable in [AuthFastLeaderElection|https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/087abf83684167ae56864fe4c3be0079fa653266/src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/AuthFastLeaderElection.java#L737] and [FastLeaderElection|https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/087abf83684167ae56864fe4c3be0079fa653266/src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/FastLeaderElection.java]:
> {code}
> volatile long logicalclock; /* Election instance */
> ...
> logicalclock++;
> {code}
> Actually this is a bug. It should use AtomicLong here instead of volatile.
> Leader.java and [QuorumPeer.java|https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/087abf83684167ae56864fe4c3be0079fa653266/src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/QuorumPeer.java#L428] and LearnerHandler.java:
> {code}
> volatile int tick;
> {code}
> I don't think it needs volatile here. The tick is incremented only in [Leader.java|https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/087abf83684167ae56864fe4c3be0079fa653266/src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/Leader.java#L590]:
> {code}
>   synchronized (this) {
>           ...
>                     if (!tickSkip) {
>                         self.tick++;
>                     }
>   }
> {code}
> and it's protected by the synchronized statement. I just remove volatile keyword.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)