You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2005/05/27 18:33:54 UTC

Re: Comparison of SA and commercial solutions

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Lima Union writes:
> On 5/27/05, aecioneto <ae...@uol.com.br> wrote:
> > > >2 hours is better than an hour and a half?
> > > >
> > > >{O,o}   (Yes, I know that you were free to do other stuff while "on
> > > >        hold" with SpamAssassin. The numbers just sort of tickled me.)
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> Any idea how many 'commercial solutions' depend on SA ?

The Wiki page http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CommercialProducts
lists a whole bunch.  Anything listed there uses SpamAssassin,
as that's a condition of listing ;)

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFCl0vyMJF5cimLx9ARAlqXAJ42Hg7tzhHnOJBRvipzg96YbwAsjgCgvSQW
JkpwRYoQQOFOXKL7+7BCsJo=
=M15j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Comparison of SA and commercial solutions

Posted by Neil Watson <sa...@watson-wilson.ca>.

On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:33:54AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
>The Wiki page http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CommercialProducts
>lists a whole bunch.  Anything listed there uses SpamAssassin,
>as that's a condition of listing ;)

Although not listed I'm pretty sure that Astaro uses SA.

-- 
Neil Watson               | Gentoo Linux
Network Administrator     | Uptime 7 days
http://watson-wilson.ca   | 2.6.11.4 AMD Athlon(tm) MP 2000+ x 2