You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tinkerpop.apache.org by "Bob Briody (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/11/13 17:03:10 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP3-958) Improve usability of .profile() step.

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15004174#comment-15004174 ] 

Bob Briody commented on TINKERPOP3-958:
---------------------------------------

I believe the common use-case is to want the TraversalMetrics to be the result of the .profile() step. I do still think it is important to enable users to obtain their regular traversal results and later access the TraversalMetrics as can currently be done via the traversal's side effects post-iteration. However, the common use case should be streamlined.

One possible, but not fantastic option, would be to have the profile step take a parameter to describe it's behavior, and if not specified it would emit TraversalMetrics. This could be a boolean parameter or possibly a more descriptive constant.


> Improve usability of .profile() step.
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP3-958
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-958
>             Project: TinkerPop 3
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: process
>            Reporter: Bob Briody
>            Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez
>
> The .profile() step is currently tedious to use. One must remember this entire string to activate profiling and cap off the result: "profile().cap(TraversalMetrics.METRICS_KEY)".
> This should be streamlined.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)